agentmods.dev

workflows:review

workflows:review is a command for Claude Code from Workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit. It costs 22 tokens per session (4,228 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review command for examining go-to-market deliverables, such as campaign or sales materials, from several independent angles. It checks strategy fit, risks, brand voice, and overall quality.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a pull request, GitHub link, Markdown file, or the current branch, then create a list of issues to resolve.
Why use it?
It helps reduce missed problems by separating the review into independent inspections and recording each finding for follow-up.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents.

not rated 104repo +11 yesterday A scan 22 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to review a pull request, GitHub link, Markdown file, or the current branch, then create a list of issues to resolve.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/review
View source ↗ Workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit workflowsio.notion.site
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for workflows:review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for workflows:review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,228 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.04228
Opus 5.5 $0.00009 $0.01691
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00846
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00423

Measured yesterday against content hash 1d1f31e1ce83, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

workflows:review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/workflows/review.md · 461 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 461 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Command

<command_purpose> Perform exhaustive reviews of GTM deliverables using multi-agent analysis, ultra-thinking, and isolated workspaces for deep independent inspection. </command_purpose>

Introduction

Senior GTM Review Lead with expertise in strategy alignment, risk assessment, brand voice, and deliverable quality assurance

This command references the file-todos and setup skills and the /resolve_todo_parallel command, none of which this kit ships. If file-todos is not installed, still write every finding into todos/ as one file per finding, using the structure described in step 5 rather than a shared template, and say in the run summary that the template was unavailable. Never drop a finding because a template is missing.

Prerequisites

Main Tasks

1. Determine Review Target & Setup (ALWAYS FIRST)

<review_target> #$ARGUMENTS </review_target>

Immediate Actions:

<task_list>

  • Determine review type: PR number (numeric), GitHub URL, file path (.md), or empty (current branch)
  • Check current git branch
  • If ALREADY on the target branch (PR branch, requested branch name, or the branch already checked out for review) - proceed with analysis on current branch
  • If DIFFERENT branch than the review target - offer to use worktree: "Use git-worktree skill for isolated review." Call skill: git-worktree with branch name
  • Fetch PR metadata using gh pr view --json for title, body, files, linked issues
  • Identify the type of deliverable: campaign copy, proposal, playbook, SOP, client report, content piece, automation config, etc.
  • Prepare context: who is the audience, what is the goal, what brand standards apply
  • Make sure we are on the branch we are reviewing. Use gh pr checkout to switch to the branch or manually checkout the branch.

Read the full file on GitHub · 461 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 461 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 1d1f31e1ce83

Subscribe to this mod's changes

workflows:review is a command published in the GitHub repository Workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit (104 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 4,228 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-09.

Code reviewMarketing and SEOai-agentsclaudecompany-oscontext-engineeringgtm
Related

workflows:review compared with commands from other repositories

workflows:review next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
workflows:reviewWorkflowsio/company-os-starter-kitCommand104yesterdayMITA22Claude Code
mach12:issue-reviewLeanAndMean/scramjetCommand88d agoApache-2.0A17Claude Code
mach12:pr-review-assessmentLeanAndMean/scramjetCommand88d agoApache-2.0A13Claude Code
mach12:pr-review-fixLeanAndMean/scramjetCommand88d agoApache-2.0A8Claude Code
mach12:pr-reviewLeanAndMean/scramjetCommand88d agoApache-2.0A16Claude Code
mach12:gh-pr-readLeanAndMean/scramjetCommand88d agoApache-2.0A25Claude Code
reviewRaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitCommand3yesterdayMITA20Claude Code