Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add xai-org/grok-build-plugin-cc/plugin install grok-buildWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xai-org/grok-build-plugin-cc/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xai-org/grok-build-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xai-org/grok-build-plugin-cc/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xai-org/grok-build-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xai-org/grok-build-plugin-cc/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00932 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- review — 89% identical, 18 lines differ
What it actually says
Run a Grok Build review through the plugin bridge (read-only plan mode).
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return Grok's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include
--wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground. - If the raw arguments include
--background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task. - Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, start with
git status --short --untracked-files=all. - For working-tree review, also inspect both
git diff --shortstat --cachedandgit diff --shortstat. - For base-branch review, use
git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD. - Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work even when
git diff --shortstatis empty. - Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant working-tree status is empty or the explicit branch diff is empty.
- Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
- In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
- When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
- For working-tree review, start with
- Then use
AskUserQuestionexactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with(Recommended):Wait for resultsRun in background
Argument handling:
- Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
- Do not strip
--waitor--backgroundyourself. - Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
--modeland--effortare runtime-selection flags. Preserve them for the bridge call; do not treat them as review focus text.- Leave
--modeland--effortunset unless the user explicitly asks for them. Accepted effort values:low,medium,high. - The bridge script parses
--waitand--background. Bridge--backgroundowns the long-running process group (detachedrun-worker+ grok agent). Claude Code'sBash(..., run_in_background: true)is only for the short enqueue call, not the long review process. /grok-build:reviewdoes not support staged-only review, unstaged-only review, or extra focus text.- If the user needs a tougher design challenge pass, they should use
/grok-build:critique.
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/grok-bridge.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"
- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
- Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
Background flow:
- Prefer the bridge's own detached worker so stop owns a stable process group. Ensure the forwarded arguments include
--background(add it if the user chose background and did not already pass the flag). - Launch with
Bash(Claude may still userun_in_background: truefor the short enqueue call; the long-running work is the bridgerun-worker):
Bash({
command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/grok-bridge.mjs" review --background "$ARGUMENTS"`,
description: "Grok Build review",
run_in_background: true
})
- Do not call
BashOutputor wait for completion in this turn. - After launching the command, tell the user: "Grok Build review started in the background. Check
/grok-build:runsfor progress. Stop with/grok-build:stop."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 65 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A d88b176d7bf2
review is a command published in the GitHub repository xai-org/grok-build-plugin-cc (243 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 932 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.