Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Xandon/claude-filemaker-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xandon/claude-filemaker-toolkit/fm-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xandon/claude-filemaker-toolkit/fm-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xandon/claude-filemaker-toolkit/fm-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00991 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00495 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
fm-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 83 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A d64e00e25715
fm-review is a command published in the GitHub repository Xandon/claude-filemaker-toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 991 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
pg-indexes
Review unused indexes that are safe to drop (pgbot).
pn-audit-data
Design or review database schema — normalization, indexing strategy, migration plan, and data model decisions. Surgical command for database design. Use standalone or as part of pn-backend-audit.
inventory
Codebase inventory skill — scans the repo for a named pattern (inline SQL, fetch calls, feature flags, debug leftovers, deprecated APIs, etc.) and emits a structured Markdown inventory cross-referenced with framework metadata (routes, handlers). Language-agnostic and pack-driven — the engine matches whatever a YAML…
review
Run the altimate-code dbt/SQL PR reviewer on the current diff, PR, or commit and present the signed verdict verbatim.
schema-gate
Review a pending DB migration. Static checks (drops/renames/truncates) run as a deterministic shell pre-pass; live-DB checks (RLS, index size, forward-compat) run via a Haiku subagent. Read-only.
cosmos-review
Review code for Azure Cosmos DB best practices and suggest optimizations.