Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xberg-io/crawlbergWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/crawlberg-scrape)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/crawlberg-scrape"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/crawlberg-scrape/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/crawlberg-scrape"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/crawlberg-scrape.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.00096 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00038 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
crawlberg-scrape scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Scrape $ARGUMENTS with crawlberg scrape. Read the scraping-html-to-markdown skill first. Use Markdown output unless structured metadata is requested; report fetch or browser failures rather than inventing page content.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 13 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 3a8317375f29
crawlberg-scrape is a command published in the GitHub repository xberg-io/crawlberg (185 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 96 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-15.
Other commands, from other repositories
OPSX: Explore
Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements.
OPSX: Apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).
OPSX: Archive
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.
OPSX: Propose
Propose a new change - create it and generate all artifacts in one step.
OPSX: Sync
Sync delta specs from a change to main specs.
dispatch-worker
Retired Pattern Z Worker loop; use cli-hierarchy (RFC-0051) instead. See docs/operations/cli-hierarchy.md. AISDLC-763.