Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xberg-io/crawlbergWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/index)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/index"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/index/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/index"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xberg-io/crawlberg/index.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00093 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00037 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
index scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- index — 89% identical, 2 lines differ
What it actually says
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 8 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bba3d47fbebd
index is a command published in the GitHub repository xberg-io/crawlberg (185 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 93 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-15.
Other commands, from other repositories
converge
Run an unattended review→fix→re-review loop on the current branch until the reviewer has no findings at or above Medium, then push once. Findings stay in a local scratch file and are never posted to GitHub. Stops early on oscillation, a red test suite, or a 4-review cap.
review
Review the current git diff — auditor selected by --mode (general, security, a11y, deps, perf, tests, contributor-trust, ux) or auto-inferred from the diff when omitted. Pass a PR number to review a specific PR; use --check-followup to re-check a PR after the owner has addressed feedback.
bmad-checkpoint-preview
LLM-assisted human-in-the-loop review. Make sense of a change, focus attention where it matters, test. Use when the user says "checkpoint", "human review", or "walk me through this change".
OPSX: Explore
Enter explore mode - think through ideas, investigate problems, clarify requirements.
OPSX: Apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental).
OPSX: Archive
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow.