Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xbim08/awesome-claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xbim08/awesome-claude-code-plugins/bug-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xbim08/awesome-claude-code-plugins/bug-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xbim08/awesome-claude-code-plugins/bug-fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xbim08/awesome-claude-code-plugins/bug-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xbim08/awesome-claude-code-plugins/bug-fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00136 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00054 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00027 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
bug-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bug-fix — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Understand the bug: $ARG
Before Starting:
- GITHUB: create a issue with the a short descriptive title.
- GIT: checkout a branch and switch to it.
Fix the Bug
On Completion:
- GIT: commit with a descriptive message.
- GIT: push the branch to the remote repository.
- GITHUB: create a PR and link the issue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A dd94b2db1d5a
bug-fix is a command published in the GitHub repository xbim08/awesome-claude-code-plugins (10 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 136 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bug-fix, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
bug-fix
Streamlines bug fixing by creating a GitHub issue first, then a feature branch for implementing and thoroughly testing the solution before merging.
claudex
Claude writes, Codex reviews, iterate until both agree — then ship with love.
verdict
Two-model verdict — Claude and Codex independently review the same diff, disagreements surfaced.
setup
Verify ClauDex prerequisites — Codex CLI, authentication, and git.
analyze-issue
Fetches GitHub issue details to create comprehensive implementation specifications, analyzing requirements and planning structured approach with clear implementation steps.
bug-detective
Systematic debugging assistant with troubleshooting steps.