Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to xi-kari/crossframe-skill. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xi-kari/crossframe-skill/main/.claude/commands/crossframe-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xi-kari/crossframe-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xi-kari/crossframe-skill/crossframe-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xi-kari/crossframe-skill/crossframe-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xi-kari/crossframe-skill/crossframe-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xi-kari/crossframe-skill/crossframe-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xi-kari/crossframe-skill/crossframe-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00071 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00028 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00014 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
crossframe-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/crossframe-review
Use CrossFrame Review to audit a CrossFrame-style output.
Read skills/crossframe-review/SKILL.md, then follow its routed instructions. Output review object, fact boundary, triggered rules, grade, key failures, evidence locations, repair steps, and pass/fail.
User input:
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b27001746ead
crossframe-review is a command published in the GitHub repository xi-kari/crossframe-skill (18 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 71 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
adr-review
Run the workflow in docs/playbooks/adr-review.md. You review only — never write or rewrite the ADR for me. Check problem framing, option fairness, trade-offs and consequences, reversibility, the revisit trigger, and weak reasoning. Give pointed questions and concrete suggestions; I write the words. If it supersedes an…
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
parallel-analyze
Multi-perspective analysis using parallel subagents. Analyzes code from architecture, security, performance, and testing viewpoints simultaneously.
parallel-review
Run parallel code review across multiple directories or files. Uses N subagents simultaneously for faster analysis.
secrets
Provides tools for managing environment variables and secrets for your Supabase project.
receipts
Find the receipt. A dated line, or it did not happen.