Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/confidence-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xiaobei930/cc-bestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/confidence-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/confidence-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/confidence-check.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.02178 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01089 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00436 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
confidence-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 248 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/confidence-check - 置信度检查
核心理念: 决策质量不靠"感觉好不好"，而靠可量化的 5 维评估。
对当前项目状态进行 5 维置信度评估，识别薄弱环节，指导下一步行动。
角色定位
- 身份: 质量评估员
- 目标: 量化评估当前阶段的决策质量和完成度
- 原则: 基于文件内容客观评分，不做主观判断
- 触发时机: 阶段完成时（非每次编辑）
5 维置信度模型
立即执行以下评估：
1. 需求明确性 (25%)
检查方式: 读取 memory-bank/progress.md 和 docs/requirements/ 目录
评分标准:
| 分数 | 条件 |
|---|---|
| 100% | 无 "TBD"、"待确认"、"待定" 标记 |
| 75% | ≤2 个待确认项 |
| 50% | 3-5 个待确认项 |
| 25% | >5 个待确认项 |
| 0% | 无需求文档 |
检查关键词: TBD, 待确认, 待定, TODO, FIXME, 待澄清, 低置信度
2. 架构一致性 (25%)
检查方式: 读取 memory-bank/architecture.md，对比最近 git diff
评分标准:
| 分数 | 条件 |
|---|---|
| 100% | architecture.md 存在且最近 7 天内更新 |
| 75% | architecture.md 存在但超过 7 天未更新 |
| 50% | architecture.md 存在但与实际代码结构不一致 |
| 25% | architecture.md 存在但内容过少（<100 字） |
| 0% | 无 architecture.md |
3. 实现完整性 (20%)
检查方式: 扫描变更文件中的 TODO/FIXME，检查测试文件存在性
评分标准:
| 分数 | 条件 |
|---|---|
| 100% | 无 TODO/FIXME + 测试文件存在 + 测试通过 |
| 75% | ≤2 个 TODO + 测试文件存在 |
| 50% | >2 个 TODO 或缺少测试文件 |
| 25% | >5 个 TODO 且无测试 |
| 0% | 核心功能未实现 |
扫描关键词: TODO, FIXME, HACK, XXX, TEMP
4. 文档同步性 (15%)
检查方式: 检查 memory-bank/progress.md 的修改时间和决策表完整性
评分标准:
| 分数 | 条件 |
|---|---|
| 100% | progress.md 今日更新 + 决策表有完整记录 |
| 75% | progress.md 今日更新 + 决策表有记录但缺置信度 |
| 50% | progress.md 3 天内更新 |
| 25% | progress.md 超过 3 天未更新 |
| 0% | 无 progress.md |
决策表检查: 验证 | 日期 | 角色 | 决策 | 依据 | 置信度 | 表格的填写率
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 248 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A bb9128b7a206
confidence-check is a command published in the GitHub repository xiaobei930/cc-best (50 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 2,178 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
audit-agents-skills
Audit quality of agents, skills, and commands in a Claude Code project.
audit-whitepapers
Audit version freshness, FR/EN parity, and metadata quality of all whitepapers and recap cards.
audit-repo-docs
Audit repository documentation against 85+ best practices from claude-code-ultimate-guide.
boldguy-linkedin-answer
Draft a LinkedIn comment on a post, referencing the guide's relevant section, in Flow style with AI markers removed.
methodology-advisor
Analyzes your codebase and asks 3 targeted questions to recommend the right AI-assisted development methodology stack.
release
Release guide version (CHANGELOG + VERSION + README + landing sync + commit + push).