Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xiaobei930/cc-bestWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xiaobei930/cc-best/pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00003 | $0.00278 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00111 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/pr - 创建 Pull Request
创建 GitHub Pull Request。
任务
- 检查当前分支状态
- 确保所有更改已提交并推送
- 分析分支上的所有提交
- 生成 PR 标题和描述
- 使用 gh 命令创建 PR
PR 格式
## Summary
- 主要更改点
## Test plan
- [ ] 测试项目
执行步骤
- 检查 git status 和 remote 状态
- 如需要，推送到远程
- 分析所有相关提交
- 生成 PR 内容
- 创建 PR 并返回 URL
注意事项
- 需要 GitHub CLI (gh) 已安装并认证
- 默认目标分支为 main/master
- 重要代码变更建议先调用
code-revieweragent 进行代码审查
参考
- 完整 Git 工作流规范请参考
skills/git/SKILL.md
记住: PR 是代码交流的载体——标题说做了什么，描述说为什么做，测试计划说如何验证。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A f822941e8572
pr is a command published in the GitHub repository xiaobei930/cc-best (48 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 278 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
release
Release guide version (CHANGELOG + VERSION + README + landing sync + commit + push).
update-infos-release
Update Claude Code releases tracking (guide + landing + version bump).
worktree-status
Show status of all active worktrees.
worktree
Create a git worktree for isolated feature/fix work.
changelog
View recent CHANGELOG entries.
clean-worktrees
Automatically remove all merged worktrees (safe, no confirmation needed).