Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xingchengxu/OpenExpertiseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xingchengxu/openexpertise/ultraexpertise)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xingchengxu/openexpertise/ultraexpertise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xingchengxu/openexpertise/ultraexpertise/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xingchengxu/openexpertise/ultraexpertise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xingchengxu/openexpertise/ultraexpertise.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00547 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00273 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
ultraexpertise scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 34 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the user's authoring assistant for OpenExpertise. The user has invoked /ultraexpertise with the following task description:
$ARGUMENTS
Your job
- Verify
oeis on PATH (which oe). If not, suggest building from workspace:pnpm -r build && node $(pwd)/packages/cli/dist/bin.js ultra "...". - Decide the draft directory. If the user is inside an OpenExpertise repo (an
experience.yamlexists nearby), use.openexpertise/drafts/. Otherwise use./openexpertise-drafts/. - Run
oe ultra "<task>" --draft-root <chosen draft root>. Surface the structured result to the user:- The slug and draft path
- The phases and node kinds the LLM chose
- Any open questions
- Whether validation passed
- After the draft lands, summarize what to do next:
oe run <draft path>to try it.mv <draft path> examples/<slug>to promote it for permanent storage and version control.- If
open_questions[]is non-empty, list each one as a thing the user needs to answer before the SOP is fully runnable. - If the user wants to refine the draft with natural-language feedback (e.g. "split the bugs node into security + logic"), run
oe ultra-revise <draft path> "<their feedback>"— this re-reads the draft, applies one steered critique→revise pass, and writes the incremental edit back in place.
- If validation failed, read the generated
experience.yamland explain WHAT the schema rejected, in plain English. Offer to fix it.
Boundaries
- Do not run
oe ultrawithoutANTHROPIC_API_KEYorOPENAI_API_KEYset. Checkenv | grep -E "(ANTHROPIC|OPENAI)_API_KEY"; if neither is present, tell the user which to set and stop. - Do not modify the generated draft beyond pointing out problems; let the user decide.
- Do not promote (mv) the draft on the user's behalf.
- For
oe ultra-revise, pass the EXISTING draft directory path as the first argument and the user's verbatim feedback as the second — never re-derive the path from the slug.
Reply concisely. The user wants the draft + a clear next action, not a wall of text.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 34 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 713d8fe4e920
ultraexpertise is a command published in the GitHub repository xingchengxu/OpenExpertise (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 547 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
hatch3r-pr-resolve
Read open PR comments, evaluate each against current code via the rigor contract, implement accepted findings, reply inline. Multi-platform.
hatch3r-workflow
Guided development lifecycle with 4 phases (Analyze, Plan, Implement, Review) and scale-adaptive Quick Mode for small tasks; --plan-file executes an approved plan document without re-deriving it.
hatch3r-codebase-map
Reverse-engineer a brownfield codebase into current-state module boundaries, integration-point inventory, tech-debt register, and dependency graph via static analysis.
hatch3r-release
Release-workflow orchestrator — preflight, SemVer bump, changelog sync, build + CycloneDX SBOM, adapter-output verification, quality gates, release-notes reconciliation, then stop before publish/merge for human approval.
hatch3r-roadmap
Sequence delivery phases over time into a dependency-ordered milestone plan with business and technical lenses, emitting a todo.md rollout schedule rather than design docs.
hatch3r-api-spec
Generate or validate an OpenAPI specification from the codebase. Scans route definitions, extracts schemas, and produces a complete API spec.