Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add XinyuQu/llm-review/plugin install llm-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xinyuqu/llm-review/kimi-setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xinyuqu/llm-review/kimi-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xinyuqu/llm-review/kimi-setup.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00809 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00404 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00081 |
Grade C, and why
kimi-setup scanned grade C with 3 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootmediumPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
- Advanced — the **user** runs this in their own terminal (never you): `printf %s 'THE_KEY' | node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/llm-review.mjs" config-set --provider kimi --transport api --api-key-stdin` (key via stdin Unrestricted tool accessmediumExcessive agency
A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.
**Security — hard rule:** never run any command containing the literal key yourself; a crafted key can inject shell commands. If the user pasted a key into the chat, do NOT put it in a command — tell them it is now expos Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
allowed-tools: Bash(node:*), Bash(npm:*), Bash(curl:*), Bash(bash:*), Bash(sh:*), Bash(brew:*), AskUserQuestion This is a copy
97% identical to gemini-setup — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Guided setup for the kimi provider. Follow this exactly; do not improvise extra steps.
Step 1 — probe status:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/llm-review.mjs" setup --provider kimi --json
Parse the JSON: mode, cli (command, installed, installCmd, login), api (hasKey, primaryEnv, keyHelp), ready, resolvedTransport, reviewCommand.
Step 2 — if already ready: tell the user it's set up via resolvedTransport, then AskUserQuestion once: Keep current setup vs Reconfigure. If keep → show status and stop.
Step 3 — choose a path by mode:
api-only→ API KEY FLOW.cli-only→ SUBSCRIPTION FLOW.both→AskUserQuestionexactly once: "How do you want to connect to Kimi?" with options, first one suffixed(Recommended):Subscription via the {cli.command} CLI (Recommended)— reuses your existing login, usually cheaper for heavy useAPI key— pay-per-token HTTP API
SUBSCRIPTION FLOW:
- If
cli.installedis false andcli.installCmdis set:AskUserQuestiononce —Install {cli.command} now (Recommended)vsSkip for now. If install, runcli.installCmdvia Bash, then re-run the Step 1 probe. If skip, present status and stop. - Persist the choice:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/llm-review.mjs" config-set --provider kimi --transport cli - Re-run the Step 1 probe. If
cli.loginindicates a login is still required (it is not the "already authenticated" note), tell the user to authenticate themselves in this session by typing:!{cli.login}— this is an interactive browser/login you cannot perform for them. - Present the final probe output.
API KEY FLOW:
-
Tell the user where to get a key:
api.keyHelp. -
Offer how to provide it, most secure first:
- Recommended: run
/plugin, open llm-review config, paste the key into the secure prompt (stored in the OS keychain). - Or export
api.primaryEnvin their shell for this session. - Advanced — the user runs this in their own terminal (never you):
printf %s 'THE_KEY' | node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/llm-review.mjs" config-set --provider kimi --transport api --api-key-stdin(key via stdin, never in argv; writes~/.config/llm-review/config.json, chmod 600).
Security — hard rule: never run any command containing the literal key yourself; a crafted key can inject shell commands. If the user pasted a key into the chat, do NOT put it in a command — tell them it is now exposed, to add it via the keychain (
/plugin) or their own shell env, and to rotate it. - Recommended: run
-
Re-run the Step 1 probe and present it.
Step 4 — finish: state whether the provider is now ready and show the exact review command (reviewCommand, e.g. /llm-review:kimi). Use AskUserQuestion at most twice total in this whole flow.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 42 lines · 25 tokens per session scan C 8e450ed59f2d
kimi-setup is a command published in the GitHub repository XinyuQu/llm-review (6 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 809 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 3 findings (asks for root, unrestricted tool access, makes network calls). It is 97% identical to gemini-setup, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.