Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xonovex/platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xonovex/platform/plan-critique)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xonovex/platform/plan-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xonovex/platform/plan-critique/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xonovex/platform/plan-critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xonovex/platform/plan-critique.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00281 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
plan-critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/xonovex-workflow:plan-critique - Adversarially Critique a Plan
Stress-test a plan independently and report findings for a separate revision.
Arguments
plan-file(optional): Path to the plan document (auto-detects from git config or the most recent plan inplans/).--mode <mode>(optional): Which adversarial lens(es) to run:red-team,pre-mortem,falsify,steelman, orall. Default:red-team+pre-mortem.
Delegation
Load the plan-guide skill (plugin xonovex-workflow) and perform its critique operation with these arguments. Run this as a fresh session / independent agent that did not author the plan. Self-critique defends instead of attacks. The skill is the source of truth for the procedure, output format, and gotchas. Do not restate them.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · -4 lines 78bc9e439b3b
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A baa33cd26498
plan-critique is a command published in the GitHub repository xonovex/platform (6 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 281 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review
System prompt for /review slash command.
code-review-give
Give mode for code-review: Review someone else's code with multi-pass analysis and structured recommendations.
review-design-verify
Phases 4-5 of reviewing-design-docs: Interface Verification + Implementation Simulation.
resolve-dependabot-prs
Triage open Dependabot PRs, return a quick risk/action summary table, then enter planning mode with an ordered rebase→merge→follow-up→resume resolution plan.
review
Review changes using MCP validation.
mr-description-creator
Generate and apply MR/PR description directly via gh or glab CLI (project).