Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/xonovex/platform/plan-followupgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xonovex/platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xonovex/platform/plan-followup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xonovex/platform/plan-followup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xonovex/platform/plan-followup.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00234 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00117 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
plan-followup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/xonovex-workflow:plan-followup - Close Out a Plan
Lifecycle: research → decide → create → revise ⇄ critique → accept → subplans-create → continue → update → validate → followup
Arguments
/plan-followup [plan-file]
plan-file(optional): Path to the plan document (auto-detects from git config if omitted)
Delegation
Load the plan-guide skill (plugin xonovex-skill-plan) and perform its
followup operation with these arguments. The skill is the source of truth
for the procedure, output format, and gotchas. Do not restate them. The record
is returned inline; hand plan seeds to /plan-create and other sections to the
caller's publish step if persistence is wanted.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 30 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A e1ed1b5f342a
plan-followup is a command published in the GitHub repository xonovex/platform (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 234 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-age
Analyze dependency freshness and maintenance activity.
test-summary
Command "test-summary" from vishnu2kmohan/mcp-server-langgraph, covering generate comprehensive test summary, 🧪 test summary generation, step 1: determine test scope, step 2: run tests and collect results and run tests with json output.
review-pr
Comprehensive PR review checklist to ensure code quality, testing, and best practices.
release-prep
Automated release readiness validation.
verify-tests
Run comprehensive test verification to ensure all tests pass before committing or merging.
audit-code
When /audit-code [target] is invoked, immediately execute the following steps to analyze code quality, security, and adherence to project standards.