Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Xopoko/build-swift-appsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xopoko/build-swift-apps/macos-signing-inspect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xopoko/build-swift-apps/macos-signing-inspect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xopoko/build-swift-apps/macos-signing-inspect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xopoko/build-swift-apps/macos-signing-inspect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xopoko/build-swift-apps/macos-signing-inspect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00196 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
macos-signing-inspect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to fix-codesign-error — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
/macos-signing-inspect
Inspect a macOS signing or entitlement failure and explain the minimum fix path.
Arguments
app: path to.appbundle or binary (optional)identity: signing identity hint (optional)mode:inspectorrepair-plan(optional, default:inspect)
Workflow
- Inspect the app bundle, executable, signing info, and entitlements.
- Determine whether the problem is identity, provisioning, hardened runtime, sandboxing, or trust policy.
- Summarize the exact failure class in plain language.
- Provide the minimal repair sequence or validation command.
Guardrails
- Never invent entitlements; read them from the binary or source files.
- Distinguish local development signing problems from distribution or notarization failures.
- Prefer verifiable commands like
codesign -d,spctl, andplutilover guesswork.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 23 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c87205264331
macos-signing-inspect is a command published in the GitHub repository Xopoko/build-swift-apps (45 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 196 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to fix-codesign-error, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
performance-optimization
Orchestrate end-to-end application performance optimization from profiling to monitoring.
refactor-clean
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.
lint-check
Runs linting and code quality checks. Catches style issues, potential bugs, and enforces project standards.
ui-aqa-flow-test-report-analysis
Phase 7 Test Report Analysis of ui-aqa-flow.
api-aqa-flow-execution-and-report-analysis
Phase 6 Execution & Report Analysis of api-aqa-flow (USER INTERACTION REQUIRED).
relationships
Explore dependencies and relationships for a file or code pattern.