Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XRenSiu/claude-code-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00709 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/design Command
Invoke the architect agent to create comprehensive system design documentation.
Usage
# Basic usage with PRD path
/design docs/prd/auth-feature.md
# With specific focus area
/design docs/prd/auth-feature.md --focus "API design"
# With constraints
/design docs/prd/auth-feature.md --constraints "PostgreSQL only, 2 week timeline"
# With existing architecture reference
/design docs/prd/auth-feature.md --existing docs/architecture/system.md
Parameters
| Parameter | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
prd_path |
✅ | Path to the approved PRD document |
--focus |
❌ | Specific area to focus on (e.g., "data layer", "security") |
--constraints |
❌ | Technical constraints to consider |
--existing |
❌ | Path to existing architecture documentation |
--output |
❌ | Custom output path (default: docs/architecture/) |
What It Does
- Reads the PRD and extracts technical requirements
- Analyzes existing codebase for integration points
- Designs system architecture with components and data flow
- Creates ADRs for significant technical decisions
- Generates diagrams (Mermaid format)
- Outputs design document to
docs/architecture/[feature]-design.md
Output Structure
docs/
├── architecture/
│ └── [feature]-design.md # Main design document
├── adr/
│ ├── [number]-[title].md # Architecture Decision Records
│ └── ...
└── diagrams/
└── [feature].mermaid # Architecture diagrams
Example
# User has completed PRD for user authentication
/design docs/prd/user-authentication.md
# Output:
# ✅ Created docs/architecture/user-authentication-design.md
# ✅ Created docs/adr/001-jwt-vs-session.md
# ✅ Created docs/adr/002-password-hashing.md
# ✅ Created docs/diagrams/user-authentication.mermaid
Pre-requisites
- ✅ PRD must be approved (reviewed and signed off)
- ✅ PRD should contain clear functional and non-functional requirements
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 108 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 1ebec1209356
design is a command published in the GitHub repository XRenSiu/claude-code-forge (2 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 709 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.