Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to xsovad06/sova. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xsovad06/sova/main/.claude/commands/address-pr.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xsovad06/sovaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xsovad06/sova/address-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xsovad06/sova/address-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xsovad06/sova/address-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xsovad06/sova/address-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xsovad06/sova/address-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.09877 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.03951 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.01975 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00988 |
Grade A, and why
address-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 528 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Address PR Review Comments
Score each review comment, address all of them (fix or acknowledge with justification), and reply on GitHub. Handles both human reviewers and automated review bots (Sourcery, CodeRabbit, etc.).
CRITICAL: Complete ALL Steps
This command runs as a headless agent. You MUST execute every step below through to completion. In headless mode, producing a text-only summary without a tool call causes the process to exit immediately, so NEVER output a final summary without having completed steps 9-18 first (capture knowledge, squash, rebase, push, reply, resolve, dismiss). If you discover that all findings are already addressed, you MUST still complete steps 9-12 (capture knowledge, squash, rebase and push) to fold in pending documentation and resolve any merge conflicts, then skip to step 13 to handle thread resolution before the summary.
Incomplete execution is worse than failure: a run that fixes code but never commits/pushes wastes the cost and leaves the PR unchanged.
Instructions
-
Get the PR number from
$ARGUMENTS. -
Fetch review data and the PR's branch names:
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json comments,reviews,body,title,headRefName,baseRefName gh api repos/<OWNER>/<REPO>/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/comments gh api repos/<OWNER>/<REPO>/pulls/<PR_NUMBER>/reviews BASE=$(gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json baseRefName --jq .baseRefName) HEAD_BRANCH=$(gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json headRefName --jq .headRefName) echo "Base branch: $BASE, head branch: $HEAD_BRANCH"Every shell block runs in a fresh shell, so variables do not carry over between blocks: each later block that uses
BASEorHEAD_BRANCHre-assigns them first with the same twogh pr viewlines (or the literal values printed here). -
Verify this is your PR and that you can push to it (STOP if not, before any worktree or commit work happens). A STOP anywhere in this step must end the run as a failure (a non-zero exit / an incomplete-run outcome), never a clean summary: the supervisor's address-cycle counter only increments on a posted
sova-addressedmarker (step 15), so a guard STOP that reports cleanly looks like "nothing to do" and the supervisor respawns/address-pron the same PR every poll with no cap on it. Reporting the STOP as a failed run at least makes the repetition visible in the run history;check_repeated_failures_gate()does not apply here (it only gates theresearcheranddeveloperroles, nevercommand:address-pr), so today only thealready_runningconcurrency guard prevents a second simultaneous spawn, and nothing caps the respawn count on an unpushable or foreign PR. Closing that gap means wiringcommand:address-printocheck_repeated_failures_gate(), which is out of scope for this change.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +22 lines b8a2203e8945
- 14d ago Changed · +105 lines 556262972434
- 16d ago Changed · +51 lines 28dd03e83d9f
- 21d ago Changed · +2 lines 8b81964c970c
- 22d ago Changed 8e65c4c1cc17
- 1mo ago Changed · +31 lines d557998381e3
- 1mo ago Changed · +24 lines a7be9b2bbc08
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines c4ed9a118b5f
- 1mo ago Changed · +42 lines cc57533ab76c
- 1mo ago First seen · 245 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 2aee4ef6f9e7
address-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository xsovad06/sova (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 9,877 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
merge
Consolidate feature branch changes and create final PR to main. This completes the v5.0 feature branch workflow after all task PRs have been merged.
update
Check for and apply KARIMO updates from GitHub releases.
code-review
Review the current branch changes for bugs and style issues.
pr-ready
Run the project's pre-commit review loop to determine whether the current branch is ready to push — lint, tests, parallel pr-review-toolkit agents plus an over-engineering audit, fix-and-re-run until convergence.
end
End a work session - a settlement pass that reconciles uncommitted / unpushed work + session context into git, the tracker, and a session snapshot file. --session (aliases --snapshot, --pre-compact, --compact) skips settlement and only writes the shared snapshot, keeping the session going.
address-pr-feedback
Systematically address PR review comments. Fetches all threads, categorizes by status (acknowledged, silently fixed, unaddressed), and guides user through posting replies and implementing fixes with explicit approval.