Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to xsovad06/sova. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xsovad06/sova/main/.claude/commands/design.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xsovad06/sovaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xsovad06/sova/design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xsovad06/sova/design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xsovad06/sova/design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xsovad06/sova/design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xsovad06/sova/design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00938 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00375 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SOVA UI Design Standards
Apply the SOVA design system to the specified UI work. Context: $ARGUMENTS
1. Load the Design System
Read these files before making any UI decisions:
sova/dashboard/static/style.css: CSS variables (Catppuccin Mocha), component classessova/dashboard/templates/base.html: layout, Tailwind config, icon macro, notification panelsova/dashboard/templates/_head.html: shared Tailwind config (centralized)sova/dashboard/templates/_icons.html: icon macro (Heroicons v2 outline)sova/dashboard/templates/_components.html: Jinja2 component macros (stat_card, card_header)sova/dashboard/static/app.js: SOVA_COLORS, toast system, browser notifications, shared utilitiesdocs/design-system.md: full design system reference
Optionally view the living style guide at /style-guide in the running dashboard.
2. Mandatory Rules
Colors
- Every color must come from the Catppuccin Mocha palette defined as CSS variables in
style.css - Tailwind classes use RGB vars:
bg-accent,text-accent-green,border-accent/30 - JS uses
window.SOVA_COLORS.accent(populated from CSS vars at init) - Never hardcode hex values in templates or JS
- Semantic meanings:
- Blue (accent): primary, links, active state
- Green: success, done, money
- Red: error, failed, danger
- Yellow: warning, running, action needed
- Purple (mauve): metadata, researcher role
Buttons (3 main variants)
- Primary:
.sova-btn .sova-btn-primaryorbg-accent/20 text-accent hover:bg-accent/30 - Danger:
.sova-btn .sova-btn-danger - Success:
.sova-btn .sova-btn-success - Warning:
.sova-btn .sova-btn-warning - Never invent new button color combinations
Cards
- Container:
.sova-cardorbg-surface-card rounded-lg border border-gray-700/50 - Header:
.sova-card-headeror use thecard_header()macro - Stat:
.sova-stat+.sova-stat-label+.sova-stat-valueor use thestat_card()macro
Typography (6 roles)
- Page heading:
text-2xl font-semibold - Section heading:
text-lg font-semibold - Label:
text-sm font-medium - Body:
text-sm(default) - Caption:
text-xs text-gray-500 - Data/numbers:
font-mono font-semibold
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed fb822bb553cf
- 2mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A eca0e5ed780c
design is a command published in the GitHub repository xsovad06/sova (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 938 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
aitask-screen-recording
Turn a screen-recording video (.mp4, .mov, .webm, .mkv from a phone, emulator or desktop) into labelled contact sheets, key frames, a timeline, and measured animation timing and easing, because coding agents can read images but not video files. Use this whenever the user gives, attaches or mentions a video or screen…
greptile-review
Execute the full Greptile review cycle on a PR, looping until score meets threshold or circuit breaker triggers.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
advanced-code-review-context
Advanced Code Review Phase 2: Context Analysis - load previous reviews, PR history, declined items.
mach12:issue-review
Read a GitHub issue and all comments, review the implementation plan, and present findings.
plan-levels
At standard and lean, each row sets one phase's spawns. A phase with no row runs as written. A row only removes or merges agents.