develop-full

A full software-development workflow that uses TDD, meaning tests are written or considered before the code, along with linting, testing, review, and commit organization.

In plain words
What is it for?
Working on GitHub issues or described tasks, following project instructions, writing tests, running checks, reviewing changes, and organizing commits.
Why use it?
It gives a repeatable path from a ticket or task description to a reviewed code change.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/xsovad06/sova/develop-full
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xsovad06/sova

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 28 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,189 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00028 $0.01189
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00594
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00238
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00119

Measured yesterday against content hash d0ffacc0fa74, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

develop-full scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/develop-full.md · 122 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Full Development Workflow

Develop a feature or fix end-to-end with TDD, testing, self-review, and clean commit history.

# Benchmark logging (entry)
bash .claude/benchmark/log.sh "develop_start" "" "" 2>/dev/null || true

Instructions

Phase 0: Understand the Task

  1. Get the task from $ARGUMENTS -- either a GitHub Issue number or a task description.
  2. If it's an issue number, fetch details:
    gh issue view <ISSUE_NUMBER> --json number,title,body,labels,milestone
    
  3. Claim the issue (GitHub Issues only):
    # Assign to self
    gh issue edit <ISSUE_NUMBER> --add-assignee @me
    
    If the project uses a GitHub Projects board, move the issue to "In Progress".
  4. Read the project's CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md for conventions and patterns.
  5. Read agent memory files if they exist:
    • .claude/agent-memory/MEMORY.md
    • .claude/agent-memory/cookbook.md
  6. Check for spec (issue numbers only): look for .claude/specs/{issue-number}-*.md.
    • If found with Status: approved: read it. Report: "Using approved spec: {filename}". The /develop step will follow this spec as its primary guide.
    • If found with Status: draft: warn the user: "Draft spec exists at {filename} but is not approved. Run /spec {issue} to review and approve it, or proceed without spec guidance." Wait for user confirmation before continuing.
    • If not found: continue silently. Specs are optional -- not every task needs one.
  7. Identify which module(s) this work touches and read relevant source code.
  8. Check current branch -- if on main/master, create a feature branch before developing:
    BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
    if [ "$BRANCH" = "main" ] || [ "$BRANCH" = "master" ]; then
      echo "On main branch. Create a feature branch before developing."
    fi
    

Phase 1: Develop (TDD)

Follow the /develop command workflow:

  1. Write tests first -- define expected behavior before implementation.
  2. Implement the solution -- follow existing codebase conventions.
  3. Scout check -- for every file touched, fix pre-existing issues you notice (failing tests, lint warnings, dead code, obvious bugs). Keep fixes small and low-risk.
  4. Run the full CI-equivalent checks: {{ check_cmd }}. This covers linting, tests, formatting, invariants, and any other CI checks.
  5. If any check fails, fix and re-run (up to 3 attempts).

Read the full file on GitHub · 122 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 122 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A d0ffacc0fa74

Subscribe to this mod's changes

develop-full is a command published in the GitHub repository xsovad06/sova (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,189 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.