Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to xsovad06/sova. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xsovad06/sova/main/.claude/commands/test.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xsovad06/sovaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xsovad06/sova/test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xsovad06/sova/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xsovad06/sova/test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xsovad06/sova/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xsovad06/sova/test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00371 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00148 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Test Runner
Run tests and linter, fixing issues iteratively until everything passes.
Instructions
Step 1: Identify the Scope
Determine what to test from $ARGUMENTS or the current directory.
If unclear, check git diff --name-only to see which modules have changes.
Step 2: Run Linter
Run the project's lint command: make lint
If linter fails:
- Analyze the errors
- Fix the code issues
- Re-run until it passes
Step 3: Run Tests
Run the project's test command: make test
If tests fail:
- Analyze the test failures
- Fix the code or tests as needed
- Re-run until they pass
Step 4: Scout Check
While fixing test or lint failures, scan each touched file for pre-existing issues: flaky test patterns, stale imports, dead code. Fix them alongside the failures. Keep scout fixes small and low-risk.
Step 5: Iterate
Repeat Steps 2-4 until both linter and tests pass completely.
Cross-References
- After tests pass: Run the
/reviewworkflow to self-review before pushing - Full workflow: Use the
/develop-fullworkflow for the complete develop-test-review-pr cycle
Rules
- Always fix linter issues before running tests
- After fixing issues, re-run to verify the fix
- Continue iterating until both pass
- Report final status when everything is green
- NEVER use emojis in any output
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago Changed e8decbe82462
- 1mo ago Changed 4078cf1be5bb
- 2mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A d9d3fe94e7ab
test is a command published in the GitHub repository xsovad06/sova (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 371 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-ready
Run the project's pre-commit review loop to determine whether the current branch is ready to push — lint, tests, parallel pr-review-toolkit agents plus an over-engineering audit, fix-and-re-run until convergence.
audit-mirage-analyze
Phases 2-3 and 7 of auditing-green-mirage: systematic line-by-line audit, the Green Mirage Patterns, named assertion shapes, and the fix-verification Test Adversary prompt.
implement-revalidate
Read by /implement when the user asks to re-validate (D-CMD-REF-HAND).
mach12:pr-validation-assessment
Independently assess executable PR candidates and commit accepted proofs.
qa
QA sign-off command. Verifies a change against acceptance criteria, runs the test suite, probes edge cases, and issues a ship / no-ship verdict via the qa-lead agent.
validate-parallel
Run assert and review-code commands in parallel to reduce validation time by 50%.