Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/xtofuub/frida-mcp-server/huntgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xtofuub/frida-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xtofuub/frida-mcp-server/hunt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xtofuub/frida-mcp-server/hunt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xtofuub/frida-mcp-server/hunt.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00919 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00460 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
hunt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Hunt $ARGUMENTS. Respect the mode tiers from /autopilot (confirm ACTIVE +
BYPASS actions unless --mode yolo). Delegate deep work to the ios-hunt
subagent (and ios-runtime for the logic phase). Cover, in order, weighting
--focus if given.
No UI control: the MCP can't tap buttons. When a flow needs UI, hook/trace first, then tell the user exactly what to press, wait for confirmation, then drain logs and analyze.
Passive (always):
mcp__frida__scanover captured traffic — plaintext HTTP, JWT alg=none, leaked API keys, CORS, cookie flags, stack traces.mcp__frida__jwton captured tokens.mcp__frida__strings/mcp__frida__dumpfor hardcoded secrets.mcp__frida__crypto_logsfor keys/IVs (armmcp__frida__crypto— BYPASS tier).mcp__frida__memoryscan for secrets.- Storage:
keychain,defaults,cookies,sqlite_query,files/read— tokens/PII at rest, secrets in UserDefaults vs Keychain.
Active (tiered):
mcp__frida__fuzzranked params — payload_set ∈ sqli, xss, idor_numeric, idor_uuid, path_traversal, cmd_inj, nosql, auth_bypass, buffer_overflow.mcp__frida__replay/replay_as— strip/swap auth for BOLA/IDOR/mass-assign.mcp__frida__race— TOCTOU on state-changing endpoints.mcp__frida__intercept/intercept_match— rewrite in-flight requests.mcp__frida__open_url— exercise each deep-link scheme handler.
IAP / paywall / entitlements (tiered): does the server enforce purchases, or
does the app trust the client? Flip local state (defaults_set, plist via
files/read, keychain), flip the gate (gates→exec), force StoreKit/receipt
validators, edit RevenueCat/Adapty caches, or rewrite the entitlement response
(intercept_match); then confirm whether paid data is still served. See
skills/reverse-engineering-ios-app-with-frida/references/iap-paywall-testing.md.
Runtime logic (tiered — the interesting bugs): delegate to ios-runtime.
gates(app_only=True)ranksBOOL-returning decision methods (by type encoding, not name) + backing ivars. Names only weight the score — don't hardcode them; low-score methods can still be the real gate.tracea candidate → user drives the flow →trace_logsto see which fire.execa return-flip (retval.replace(ptr(1))) orinstances+inspect+callone object; re-drive the flow; observe whether capability is gained.- See
skills/reverse-engineering-ios-app-with-frida/references/runtime-logic-hunting.md.
Bypass (tiered, defense-quality test):
mcp__frida__ssl_unpin,mcp__frida__jb_bypass— if trivially bypassed, that's a finding about defense strength.
Map every candidate to a control in
skills/reverse-engineering-ios-app-with-frida/references/masvs-checklist.md and
owasp-mobile-top10.md. Use bugbounty-playbooks.md for concrete chains.
For each hit, log the winning technique: python scripts/memory.py log patterns.
Output: candidate findings with evidence + the exact tool calls to reproduce.
Hand them to /validate.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 59 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A a3220ebdc5f5
hunt is a command published in the GitHub repository xtofuub/frida-mcp-server (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 919 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.