code-review

code-review is a command for coding agents from xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh. It costs 10 tokens per session (555 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review command that examines changed files for security, quality, maintainability, performance, accessibility, and style problems. It produces a structured report with each issue’s severity, location, and suggested fix.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing Git changes, finding issues such as injection risks, exposed credentials, weak error handling, missing tests, and style problems, and deciding which issues block submission.
Why use it?
Important defects can be missed when changes are reviewed informally, especially security flaws or missing validation. The command provides a consistent checklist before code is submitted.

Command

Part of the everything-claude-code-zh plugin — 17 skills, 26 commands, 13 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh/code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh

Or install everything-claude-code-zh, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 17 skills, 26 commands, 13 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh/code-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 555 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00010 $0.00555
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00278
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00111
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00056

Measured 4d ago against content hash 824d44805090, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.opencode/commands/code-review.md · 69 lines

What it actually says

代码审查(Code Review)命令

针对代码质量、安全性和可维护性审查代码变更:$ARGUMENTS

你的任务

  1. 获取已变更文件:运行 git diff --name-only HEAD
  2. 分析每个文件的潜在问题
  3. 生成结构化报告
  4. 提供可操作的改进建议

检查项分类

安全问题(致命 - CRITICAL)

  • 硬编码的凭据(Credentials)、API keys、tokens
  • SQL 注入(SQL injection)漏洞
  • XSS 漏洞
  • 缺少输入验证(Input validation)
  • 不安全的依赖项(Insecure dependencies)
  • 路径穿越(Path traversal)风险
  • 身份验证/授权(Authentication/authorization)缺陷

代码质量(高 - HIGH)

  • 函数超过 50 行
  • 文件超过 800 行
  • 嵌套深度 > 4 层
  • 缺少错误处理(Error handling)
  • 遗留 console.log 语句
  • TODO/FIXME 注释
  • 公开 API 缺少 JSDoc

最佳实践(中 - MEDIUM)

  • 可变模式(Mutation patterns,建议改用不可变模式 immutable)
  • 不必要的复杂性
  • 新代码缺少测试(Missing tests)
  • 可访问性(Accessibility/a11y)问题
  • 性能顾虑

风格(低 - LOW)

  • 命名不一致
  • 缺少类型注解(Type annotations)
  • 格式化问题

报告格式

针对发现的每个问题:

**[SEVERITY]** file.ts:123
问题 (Issue): [Description]
修复 (Fix): [How to fix]

判定决策

  • CRITICAL(致命)或 HIGH(高)问题:阻止提交,必须修复
  • MEDIUM(中)问题:建议在合并前修复
  • LOW(低)问题:可选的改进建议

重要说明:绝不要批准包含安全漏洞的代码!

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 69 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 824d44805090

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh (1,927 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 555 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.