verify

A command for marking a DomainTome node as checked today. DomainTome nodes are records that describe parts of a codebase.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after manually checking that a DomainTome node still accurately describes the code, or when resolving stale or never-verified findings.
Why use it?
It keeps the record’s verification date current after you have inspected the related code, without falsely marking unreviewed information as correct.

Command

Part of the dt plugin — 1 skill, 9 commands, 1 agent, 2 hooks, 1 MCP server shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/yacb2/domaintome/verify
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yacb2/domaintome

Or install dt, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 9 commands, 1 agent, 2 hooks, 1 MCP server.

Per session 26 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 235 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00026 $0.00235
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00118
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00047
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00023

Measured 2d ago against content hash 72a308d16fce, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/domaintome/commands/verify.md · 31 lines

What it actually says

Refresh the last_verified_at timestamp on a node. Use this after you have manually re-inspected the referenced code and confirmed the node still describes it correctly.

Steps

  1. Run:

    dt verify $ARGUMENTS
    
  2. Report the result in one line. If the command succeeds, say: "Verified — last_verified_at=." If it fails (node not found), say so and suggest dt_query or /dt:show to find the correct id.

When to use

  • After a manual inspection of the code a node describes.
  • In response to a reconcile finding under stale or never_verified.
  • Not as a way to "silence" reconcile without actually looking at the code. The verification flag carries meaning; don't spam it.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 31 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 72a308d16fce

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verify is a command published in the GitHub repository yacb2/domaintome (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 235 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.