Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yaomeng1749/claude-code-digital-nomad-config-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/yaomeng1749/claude-code-digital-nomad-config-pack/rust-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yaomeng1749/claude-code-digital-nomad-config-pack/rust-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yaomeng1749/claude-code-digital-nomad-config-pack/rust-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00973 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00487 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
rust-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 143 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 19e9eb0c5805
rust-review is a command published in the GitHub repository Yaomeng1749/claude-code-digital-nomad-config-pack (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 973 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
rust-review
Comprehensive Rust code review for ownership, lifetimes, error handling, unsafe usage, and idiomatic patterns. Invokes the rust-reviewer agent.
rust:audit-clean-arch
Comprehensive audit of Rust codebase against Clean Architecture principles, identifying violations and improvement opportunities.
rust:suggest-refactor
Actionable refactoring suggestions for improving clean architecture compliance in Rust projects.
rust:audit-dependencies
Deep-dive audit of dependency direction ensuring the Dependency Rule is followed in Rust projects.
rust:audit-layer-boundaries
Analyze layer boundary definitions in Rust codebases, identifying mixed responsibilities and violations.
rust:audit-ports-adapters
Audit Ports and Adapters (Hexagonal Architecture) pattern implementation in Rust codebases.