Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/explore-prdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/explore-prd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/explore-prd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/explore-prd.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01024 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00512 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
explore-prd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Explore PRD Command
Lightweight exploration of feature ideas before committing to full PRD.
Purpose
Validate feature ideas early:
- Quick problem validation
- Solution brainstorming
- Effort estimation
- Go/No-Go decision
- Lightweight documentation
Workflow
1. Problem Definition
Capture initial idea:
- User pain point
- Current workaround
- Frequency and impact
- Evidence (if available)
Example:
🔍 Exploring: Export to PDF
Problem: Users can't share reports offline
Current: Screenshots or manual copy-paste
Frequency: ~20 requests/month
Impact: Medium (workaround exists)
2. Solution Brainstorming
Generate alternatives:
- Approach A: Build custom PDF generator
- Approach B: Use third-party service (e.g., PDFKit)
- Approach C: Browser print-to-PDF
- Approach D: Export to Google Docs, then PDF
Quick pros/cons for each.
3. Rough Effort Estimate
T-shirt sizing:
- S (1-2 days)
- M (3-5 days)
- L (1-2 weeks)
- XL (2+ weeks)
Include:
- Development time
- Testing time
- Documentation time
4. Competitive Check
Quick research:
- What do competitors do?
- Industry standard approach?
- Open source libraries available?
5. Decision Point
Three outcomes:
-
GO → Create PRD:
- Problem validated
- Solution promising
- Effort acceptable
- Action:
/create-prdwith exploration as input
-
DEFER:
- Good idea but not now
- Timing not right
- Action: Save in
.prds/ideas/for later
-
KILL:
- Not worth doing
- Better alternatives exist
- Action: Document reasoning, close exploration
6. Document Exploration
Save exploration to .prds/explorations/YYYY-MM-DD-feature-name.md:
# Exploration: Feature Name
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Status**: Go/Defer/Kill
## Problem
{What user pain we're solving}
## Solutions Considered
1. Approach A: {pros/cons}
2. Approach B: {pros/cons}
## Recommended Approach
{Which solution to pursue and why}
## Effort
{T-shirt size with rough breakdown}
## Decision
{Go/Defer/Kill with reasoning}
## Next Steps
{What to do next}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 195 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 4455c415f277
explore-prd is a command published in the GitHub repository Yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow (12 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,024 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
brooks-debt
Run a Brooks-Lint tech debt assessment.
brooks-health
Run a Brooks-Lint codebase health dashboard across all four dimensions.
plan
Turn an approved spec into an implementation plan an engineer with zero context could execute — with a quality controller that blocks placeholders and hollow tasks.
simplify
The over-engineering review: five tags (delete, stdlib, native, yagni, shrink), a mandatory replacement per finding, and a real null result when there is nothing to cut.
audit
Onboard an existing codebase: every domain's checks over the whole tree, then a triaged plan to bring it in line.
test
Run the repository's actual test suite: every ecosystem's canonical runner — NOT run is never green.