Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/yezannnnn/agentgroup/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yezannnnn/agentGroupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/yezannnnn/agentgroup/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yezannnnn/agentgroup/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yezannnnn/agentgroup/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00279 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00139 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/review - 代码审查
对指定代码进行全面审查
使用方式
/review [文件路径或目录]
执行步骤
-
读取目标代码文件
-
按以下维度审查：
代码规范
- 命名规范（变量、函数、类）
- 代码结构和组织
- 注释完整性和准确性
- 代码风格一致性
逻辑正确性
- 业务逻辑是否正确
- 边界条件处理
- 错误处理机制
- 空值/异常处理
安全性
- 输入验证
- SQL注入/XSS防护
- 敏感信息处理
- 权限控制
可维护性
- 代码复杂度
- 重复代码
- 依赖合理性
- 可测试性
-
输出审查报告，分类问题：
- 🔴 严重（必须修复）
- 🟡 一般（建议修复）
- 🔵 建议（可选优化）
-
询问是否通知贾维斯修复
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 44 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 63d5adeb3509
review is a command published in the GitHub repository yezannnnn/agentGroup (149 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 279 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.