Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ysfAskri/archguardian. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ysfAskri/archguardian/master/.cursor/commands/summarize.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ysfAskri/archguardianWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ysfaskri/archguardian/summarize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ysfaskri/archguardian/summarize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ysfaskri/archguardian/summarize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ysfaskri/archguardian/summarize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ysfaskri/archguardian/summarize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00054 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00022 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00011 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
summarize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Generate visual change summary with Mermaid impact diagram.
- Run
npx archguardian summarize --format mermaid - Display the Mermaid diagram
- Explain the impact chain from changed files to consumers
- If no staged changes, suggest staging files first
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 7 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f314199511cb
summarize is a command published in the GitHub repository ysfAskri/archguardian (4 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 54 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-impl
Unbiased review of another session's implementation (diff, staged, or branch).
re-review
Round 2+ review — confirm revisions landed, catch regressions, do not re-litigate.
review-spec
Unbiased review of another session's spec or design doc.
check
Fail on NET-NEW architecture violations only — the same ratchet ArchSteer runs in CI, run right now.
review
Two-stage code review (spec compliance + code quality).
simplify
The over-engineering review: five tags (delete, stdlib, native, yagni, shrink), a mandatory replacement per finding, and a real null result when there is nothing to cut.