Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00371 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00148 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use Antigravity (agy / Gemini) as an independent, different-model reviewer of the
current changes, then reconcile the findings yourself (you are the final judge).
Scope/flags: $ARGUMENTS
Do this:
- Capture the diff:
git diff(or the range/paths in the scope above; default to uncommitted + last commit if unspecified). - Delegate the review to agy (pro tier) — pipe the diff in on stdin:
git diff | agy-delegate --tier pro -(This runs as YOU, the conductor. Theantigravity-delegatesubagent cannot pipe — its PreToolUse gate refuses every pipeline since GHSA-hwv2-vjgj-8rcv, becausegitwith arbitrary arguments executes arbitrary commands andcatfeeding the wrapper ships any file to the external model. If you delegate this step, pass--dir.) with an instruction to find correctness/security/performance bugs, be skeptical, and list each asfile:line — issue. If--adversarialis set, also have it challenge the design decisions and tradeoffs, not just line bugs. - Reconcile: for each finding, corroborate it against the actual code. Drop false positives; keep what's real. Agreement across two model families is a stronger signal; disagreement is a prompt to look closer.
- Report the reconciled findings (most severe first) and your verdict.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 3be9de74386b
review is a command published in the GitHub repository yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code (416 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 371 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review
Send the current git diff to Antigravity (agy) for code review. Optional focus text to steer the review.
review
Get a code review from Gemini (via agy) as a second opinion.
implement
Have Gemini (via agy) implement a task by editing files directly.
adversarial-review
Get a devil's advocate review that challenges your design decisions.
ask
Ask Gemini (via agy) a question, optionally with file context.
gemini-validate
Get a Gemini second opinion on a plan, diff, or claim.