Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/master/.github/prompts/close_unfinished_code.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/close_unfinished_code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/close_unfinished_code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/close_unfinished_code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/close_unfinished_code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/close_unfinished_code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02068 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01034 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00414 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
close_unfinished_code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 335 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are working inside the already-loaded repository zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp.
Primary objective: close the most critical unfinished-code, placeholder, and stub-implementation gaps without bypassing the repository-defined lifecycle process. You must use TDD. HIL validation must use real connected PreSonus StudioLive hardware, not mocks or assumptions.
Non-negotiable rules
-
Do not start implementation immediately.
-
First discover and follow the repository’s defined lifecycle/process exactly.
-
Use the repository workflow in this order unless the repo defines a stricter one:
- requirements
- architecture impact
- design
- tests
- implementation
- HIL validation
- documentation/capability matrix update
- release-readiness/traceability update
-
Use TDD:
- write or update failing tests first;
- prove they fail for the current implementation;
- implement the smallest change required;
- prove tests pass;
- then perform HIL validation with real mixers.
-
Do not claim a feature is supported unless there is evidence:
- unit/integration test evidence;
- real hardware-in-loop evidence where mixer behavior is involved;
- documented model and firmware metadata;
- updated capability classification.
-
Do not replace unknown behavior with guessed logic.
-
Do not convert stubs into fake success responses.
-
Do not mark
stub,probe_required,inferred, ornot_verifiabletools as complete unless the evidence threshold is met. -
Write tools must remain disabled by default and safety-gated.
-
If real hardware is unavailable or not detected, stop before HIL-dependent implementation claims. You may still add failing tests, probe plans, documentation, and safe scaffolding, but you must not mark HIL-dependent work as observed or supported.
Skills to use
If these skills exist in the repo, use them explicitly and follow their contracts:
.github/skills/stub-placeholder-elimination/SKILL.md.github/skills/mcp-capability-contract/SKILL.md.github/skills/routing-reverse-engineering/SKILL.md.github/skills/hil-probe-design/SKILL.md.github/skills/mcp-write-safety-gate/SKILL.md.github/skills/fat-channel-calibration/SKILL.md.github/skills/traceability-enforcement/SKILL.md.github/skills/release-readiness-audit/SKILL.md.github/skills/dependency-ci-hygiene/SKILL.md.github/skills/github-housekeeping/SKILL.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 335 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 09b133a14d0e
close_unfinished_code is a command published in the GitHub repository zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,068 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
bugfix
Bug fix workflow: root cause analysis → user review → regression test + fix via TDD.
fix
Correction automatisee des bugs identifies par la QA Recette.
tdd
Correction de Bug en Mode TDD/BDD.
hatch3r-bug-pipeline
Run a known-cause bug fix through a 3-phase test-first pipeline -- reproduce + root-cause, regression-test + fix together, then root-cause-depth review -- with full sub-agent delegation.
bugfix
Regression-test-first bug fixing workflow with smart SpecSwarm/SpecTest integration.
qa
Validate an application against a Gherkin user story by spawning a QA team that drives the running app.