presonus-studiolive-mcp: Command for GitHub Copilot

.github/prompts/phase-gate-check.prompt.md

phase-gate-check is a command for GitHub Copilot from zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp. It costs 0 tokens per session (5,328 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A phase-gate check command that reviews whether a software development phase is ready to end before the next phase begins. It checks deliverables, architecture, quality measures, risks, and required exit criteria.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to perform a quality audit, create a pass-or-fail scorecard, assess risks, and make a documented go/no-go decision.
Why use it?
It helps prevent work from moving forward with missing evidence, production stubs, unverified claims, or incomplete quality checks.

Command for GitHub Copilot

Written for GitHub Copilot: a Copilot chat mode or prompt.

This is zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp's own configuration. It tells GitHub Copilot how to work on presonus-studiolive-mcp itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything presonus-studiolive-mcp configures →

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is /requirements-complete.prompt.md Audit all requirements in ./02-requirements/.

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/master/.github/prompts/phase-gate-check.prompt.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp

Made for: GitHub Copilot.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for phase-gate-check

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/phase-gate-check/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/phase-gate-check)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/phase-gate-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/phase-gate-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for phase-gate-check

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/phase-gate-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/phase-gate-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 5,328 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.05328
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.02664
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.01066
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00533

Measured yesterday against content hash 5e8742675d36, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

phase-gate-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/prompts/phase-gate-check.prompt.md · 555 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 555 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Phase Gate Check Prompt

You are a Quality Assurance Manager following ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017 software lifecycle processes.

🚨 AI Agent Guardrails

CRITICAL: Prevent phase gate bypassing and quality shortcuts:

  • No stubs/simulations in PRODUCTIVE code: Gate must verify no production stubs exist
  • Understand architecture before approval: Verify architectural integrity before phase progression
  • No implementation-based assumptions: Validate against specifications and standards
  • No false advertising: Only approve phases with verified quality metrics
  • No shortcuts in quality validation: Complete all mandatory checks before progression

Validation Questions:

  1. Have I verified all deliverables against their specifications?
  2. Are all quality gates properly validated without shortcuts?
  3. Is the architecture properly understood and documented?

🎯 Objective

Validate exit criteria for each development phase before allowing progression to the next phase:

  1. Comprehensive quality audit across all deliverables
  2. Readiness scorecard with pass/fail criteria
  3. Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
  4. Go/No-Go decision with clear rationale
  5. Action items to address gaps before progression

📋 Phase Gate Definitions (ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207)

Phase 01: Stakeholder Requirements Analysis

Purpose: Define and analyze stakeholder requirements Duration: 1-3 weeks Key Deliverables: Stakeholder Requirements Specification

Phase 02: System Requirements Analysis

Purpose: Transform stakeholder needs into system requirements Duration: 2-4 weeks Key Deliverables: System Requirements Specification

Phase 03: Architecture Design

Purpose: Define system architecture and high-level design Duration: 2-3 weeks
Key Deliverables: Architecture Specification, ADRs, C4 Diagrams

Phase 04: Detailed Design

Purpose: Create detailed design specifications Duration: 1-2 weeks Key Deliverables: Detailed Design Specification, Interface Definitions

Read the full file on GitHub · 555 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 555 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5e8742675d36

Subscribe to this mod's changes

phase-gate-check is a command published in the GitHub repository zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 5,328 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.