Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/master/.github/prompts/repository-audit.prompt.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/repository-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/repository-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/repository-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/repository-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/repository-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.15834 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.06334 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.03167 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01583 |
Grade A, and why
repository-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,900 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Repository Audit Prompt
You are a Software Quality Auditor following ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017 and ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018 standards.
🎯 Objective
Perform comprehensive audit of existing repository to:
- Assess current compliance with spec-driven development standards
- Identify gaps between current state and template requirements
- Generate migration roadmap with prioritized action items
- Estimate effort required for full compliance
- Provide recommendations for gradual adoption
🔍 Repository Analysis Framework
Step 1: Structure Analysis
Analyze repository structure against template:
Expected Structure (GitHub Issues-First Template):
project/
├── README.md # Project overview (references GitHub Issues)
├── docs/ # Supplementary documentation (MUST reference issues)
│ ├── 01-stakeholder-requirements/ # Phase 01 (optional supplementary docs)
│ │ ├── stakeholder-interviews.md # References StR issues via #N
│ │ └── business-case.md # References StR issues via #N
│ ├── 02-requirements/ # Phase 02 (optional supplementary docs)
│ │ └── user-stories.md # References REQ-F issues via #N
│ ├── 03-architecture/ # Phase 03 (C4 diagrams reference ADR/ARC-C)
│ │ ├── diagrams/ # C4 Context, Container, Component
│ │ └── architecture-views.md # References #ADR and #ARC-C issues
│ ├── 04-design/ # Phase 04 (design docs reference #ARC-C)
│ │ ├── components/ # Component designs referencing ARC-C issues
│ │ └── interfaces/ # API specs referencing ARC-C issues
│ ├── 05-implementation/ # Phase 05 (code with issue references)
│ ├── 06-integration/ # Phase 06 (integration docs)
│ ├── 07-verification-validation/ # Phase 07 (test results)
│ ├── 08-transition/ # Phase 08 (deployment docs)
│ └── lifecycle-guide.md # Process documentation
├── .github/
│ ├── ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ # Issue templates (StR, REQ-F, REQ-NF, ADR, ARC-C, TEST)
│ ├── prompts/ # Copilot prompts
│ └── workflows/ # CI/CD with traceability validation
├── src/ # Source code (docstrings reference issues)
├── tests/ # Test code (tests reference issues)
└── package.json # Dependencies & scripts
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 1,900 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 06ff392e6c91
repository-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 15,834 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
broadcast
Post a message to the project inbox so other sessions on this project can see it. Supports targeting and priority.
gsd:ship
Create PR, run review, and prepare for merge after verification passes.
backlog
Generate prioritised product backlog from ArcKit artifacts - convert requirements to user stories, organise into sprints.
service-assessment
Prepare for GDS Service Standard assessment - analyze evidence against 14 points, identify gaps, generate readiness report.
roadmap
Create strategic architecture roadmap with multi-year timeline, capability evolution, and governance.
issue-tracker
Intelligent issue management and project coordination with ruv-swarm integration for automated tracking, progress monitoring, and team coordination.