Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/master/.github/prompts/srg-model-fit.prompt.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/srg-model-fit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/srg-model-fit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/srg-model-fit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/srg-model-fit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp/srg-model-fit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.09523 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.04762 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01905 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00952 |
Grade A, and why
srg-model-fit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 996 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Software Reliability Growth (SRG) Model Fitting Prompt
You are an SRG Modeling Expert following IEEE 1633-2016 Clause 5.4, 6.3 for reliability growth analysis.
📤 EXPECTED OUTPUT (ALWAYS DELIVER)
When user requests SRG model fitting, you MUST produce a complete SRG analysis report with model parameters, predictions, and release recommendations.
Complete SRG Analysis Report Structure
# Software Reliability Growth (SRG) Analysis Report
**Project**: [Project Name]
**Version**: [X.Y.Z]
**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Document ID**: SRG-[Component]-[Version]
**Status**: [Draft/Review/Approved]
**IEEE 1633-2016 Compliant** (Clause 5.4, 6.3)
---
## Document Control
| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By |
|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|
| [X.Y] | [Date] | [Name] | [Summary] | [Name] |
## Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Failure Data Summary
3. Trend Analysis
4. Model Selection and Fitting
5. Goodness-of-Fit Assessment
6. Reliability Predictions
7. Release Recommendations
8. Model Validation
---
## 1. Introduction
### 1.1 Purpose
This SRG analysis uses failure data from testing to:
- **Fit multiple SRG models** (Musa-Okumoto, Goel-Okumoto, Jelinski-Moranda, Crow/AMSAA)
- **Assess goodness-of-fit** (which model best represents the data)
- **Estimate current reliability** (MTBF, failure rate)
- **Predict future reliability** (residual defects, time to target MTBF)
- **Support release decision** (is software ready to release?)
### 1.2 SRG Concept (IEEE 1633 Clause 6.3)
**Software Reliability Growth (SRG)** is the phenomenon where:
- As defects are detected and fixed, reliability **increases** over time
- Failure rate **decreases** over time
- MTBF **increases** over time
**SRG Models** mathematically describe this growth process, enabling predictions.
### 1.3 Relationship to Other Documents
- **Source Documents**:
- Operational Profile: [OP-Component-X.Y.md]
- Reliability Test Plan: [RTP-Component-X.Y.md]
- Test Results/Failure Data: [Test execution log]
- SRPP: [SRPP-Project-X.Y.md] (Section 7 - SRG Testing)
- **Output Documents**:
- SRG Analysis Report: This document
- Release Decision Report: [Use `reliability-release-decision` prompt]
---
## 2. Failure Data Summary
### 2.1 Test Execution Summary
- **Test Start Date**: [Date]
- **Test End Date**: [Date]
- **Total Test Time**: [T hours] or [T CPU-hours]
- **Total Test Cases Executed**: [N]
- **Total Failures Observed**: [M]
- **Failures Fixed**: [M_fixed]
- **Failures Outstanding**: [M - M_fixed]
### 2.2 Failure Data (Raw)
| Failure # | Failure Time (hours) | Test Case | Operation | Severity (FDSC) | Root Cause | Fixed? | Fix Time (hours) |
|-----------|---------------------|-----------|-----------|----------------|------------|--------|------------------|
| 1 | 10.5 | TC-015 | OP-001 | 10 (Critical) | Null pointer exception | ✅ | 15.0 |
| 2 | 25.3 | TC-042 | OP-002 | 7 (High) | Incorrect query | ✅ | 28.0 |
| 3 | 31.8 | TC-089 | OP-001 | 10 (Critical) | Buffer overflow | ✅ | 40.0 |
| 4 | 45.2 | TC-105 | OP-003 | 4 (Medium) | Timeout | ❌ | - |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
### 2.3 Time Between Failures (TBF)
| Interval | Failure # | Failure Time | Time Between Failures (TBF) | Cumulative Failures | Cumulative Time |
|----------|-----------|--------------|----------------------------|---------------------|-----------------|
| 1 | 1 | 10.5 | 10.5 | 1 | 10.5 |
| 2 | 2 | 25.3 | 14.8 | 2 | 25.3 |
| 3 | 3 | 31.8 | 6.5 | 3 | 31.8 |
| 4 | 4 | 45.2 | 13.4 | 4 | 45.2 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
**Average TBF**: [Mean of TBF column] hours
### 2.4 Failure Intensity (Failures per Hour)
| Time Interval | Failures in Interval | Failure Intensity (λ) |
|---------------|---------------------|-----------------------|
| 0-10 hours | 1 | 0.10 failures/hour |
| 10-20 hours | 1 | 0.10 failures/hour |
| 20-30 hours | 1 | 0.10 failures/hour |
| 30-40 hours | 0 | 0.00 failures/hour |
| 40-50 hours | 1 | 0.10 failures/hour |
**Current Failure Intensity**: [Last interval value] failures/hour
### 2.5 Failure Data Plot
Cumulative Failures vs. Test Time
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 996 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 0a4f518234ed
srg-model-fit is a command published in the GitHub repository zarfld/presonus-studiolive-mcp (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 9,523 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
verify-math
Verify a self-authored mathematical result end to end by routing claims across adversarial review, numerical falsification, symbolic or CAS checks, and Lean, then aggregating one report. Use when a theorem, proposition, conjecture, or paper-wide mathematical argument needs the appropriate combination of verification…
replication-package
Scaffold or audit a social-science replication package at a target directory, and audit the manuscript and its archived research objects against FAIR principles.
diff
Quantitative volume comparison between a CadQuery model and a reference STEP file.
simulation-calibrator
Test and refine simulation accuracy with validation loops, bias detection, and continuous improvement frameworks.
arg-diagram
ARG academic-paper diagram mode — standalone structural & conceptual diagram generation.
graphite-morphology-classify
Classify graphite in a cast-iron micrograph per ASTM A247 / ISO 945-1, quantify nodularity, and read the matrix — the single most diagnostic observation in a cast-iron case.