Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zekiriabd/SDD-Pro. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zekiriabd/SDD-Pro/main/.claude/commands/sdd-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zekiriabd/SDD-ProWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/sdd-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/sdd-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/sdd-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/sdd-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/sdd-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.05850 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.02340 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00585 |
Grade A, and why
sdd-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 464 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/sdd-review — Audit qualité consolidé par FEAT (style Sonar)
Phase A — rapport seul, 0 auto-fix. Re-run du scan déterministe
quality_scan.py, agrégation
des findings de tous les auditeurs déjà persistés dans
console.db (qa_quality, qa_code_review,
qa_security, qa_a11y, qa_performance, qa_spec_compliance), triage
déterministe par owner (backend / frontend / shared / unknown) basé sur
le path, calcul du verdict 🟢/🟡/🔴 contre ReviewFailOn, persistance dans
validation_reports(report_type='review'). Rendu Markdown à la demande
(aucun fichier, 2026-07-06) : query_console_db.py review --feat {n} --format md.
Phase B (à venir v7.2) : auto-fix loop (dispatcher dispatch_fixes.py
écrit, non encore wired à une commande user-facing).
Phase C (✅ déjà câblée v7.0.0) : agent arch-reviewer (Pattern + Layers
- ADRs) auto-invoqué par
/dev-runSTEP 6.4 (auditor batch) et/sdd-reviewSTEP 3.0. Cf.agents/arch-reviewer.md.
Usage
/sdd-review {n} # audit FEAT {n}, verdict + report
/sdd-review {n} --skip-scans # lecture DB seule (sans re-scan)
/sdd-review {n} --ensure-scans # v7.0.0 : exit 3 si une source QA obligatoire manque
/sdd-review {n} --fail-on critical # override seuil (info|minor|moderate|serious|critical)
/sdd-review {n} --json # sortie JSON pour CI/tooling
/sdd-review {n} --no-adversarial # v7.1 : skip adversarial-reviewer (actif par défaut)
/sdd-review {n} --no-spec-gate # v7.0.0+ : skip Stage A spec-compliance gate (legacy comportement parallèle)
--ensure-scans (v7.0.0, codex audit follow-up) : exige que toutes les
sources auditeur obligatoires soient présentes dans console.db avant
de produire le verdict consolidé. Évite le faux 🟢 GREEN quand un agent
auditor a simplement été oublié pour cette FEAT.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 464 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A bc28708b6e9f
sdd-review is a command published in the GitHub repository zekiriabd/SDD-Pro (196 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 5,850 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
deep-audit.skeleton
Description: This section is populated by Bootstrap with manifest data. Required manifest fields: project.description, stack.primary, project.structure, project.subprojects, stack.orm, stack.authmethod Example output.
harness:audit
Cross-dimensional codebase audit orchestrator — classify repo shape, fan out parallel read-only audit agents, dedup and severity-rank findings against existing issues, publish grouped tracking issues.
modify
Command "modify" from MartyBonacci/specswarm, covering user input, flag parsing, parse flags from arguments, mode routing and goal.
prism-graph
Export Prism's graph of this repository and summarise it.
hotfix
Ship a fast branch-based P0 hotfix — diagnose, implement, open a ready-for-review PR, then verify + review after (deferred by design).