Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zekiriabd/SDD-Pro. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zekiriabd/SDD-Pro/main/.claude/commands/sdd-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zekiriabd/SDD-ProWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/sdd-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/sdd-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/sdd-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.05850 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.02925 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.01170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00585 |
Grade A, and why
sdd-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 464 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/sdd-review — Audit qualité consolidé par FEAT (style Sonar)
Phase A — rapport seul, 0 auto-fix. Re-run du scan déterministe
quality_scan.py, agrégation
des findings de tous les auditeurs déjà persistés dans
console.db (qa_quality, qa_code_review,
qa_security, qa_a11y, qa_performance, qa_spec_compliance), triage
déterministe par owner (backend / frontend / shared / unknown) basé sur
le path, calcul du verdict 🟢/🟡/🔴 contre ReviewFailOn, persistance dans
validation_reports(report_type='review'). Rendu Markdown à la demande
(aucun fichier, 2026-07-06) : query_console_db.py review --feat {n} --format md.
Phase B (à venir v7.2) : auto-fix loop (dispatcher dispatch_fixes.py
écrit, non encore wired à une commande user-facing).
Phase C (✅ déjà câblée v7.0.0) : agent arch-reviewer (Pattern + Layers
- ADRs) auto-invoqué par
/dev-runSTEP 6.4 (auditor batch) et/sdd-reviewSTEP 3.0. Cf.agents/arch-reviewer.md.
Usage
/sdd-review {n} # audit FEAT {n}, verdict + report
/sdd-review {n} --skip-scans # lecture DB seule (sans re-scan)
/sdd-review {n} --ensure-scans # v7.0.0 : exit 3 si une source QA obligatoire manque
/sdd-review {n} --fail-on critical # override seuil (info|minor|moderate|serious|critical)
/sdd-review {n} --json # sortie JSON pour CI/tooling
/sdd-review {n} --no-adversarial # v7.1 : skip adversarial-reviewer (actif par défaut)
/sdd-review {n} --no-spec-gate # v7.0.0+ : skip Stage A spec-compliance gate (legacy comportement parallèle)
--ensure-scans (v7.0.0, codex audit follow-up) : exige que toutes les
sources auditeur obligatoires soient présentes dans console.db avant
de produire le verdict consolidé. Évite le faux 🟢 GREEN quand un agent
auditor a simplement été oublié pour cette FEAT.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 464 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A bc28708b6e9f
sdd-review is a command published in the GitHub repository zekiriabd/SDD-Pro (191 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 5,850 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor-clean
You are a code refactoring expert specializing in clean code principles, SOLID design patterns, and modern software engineering best practices. Analyze and refactor the provided code to improve its quality, maintainability, and performance.
codebase-review
Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.
modify
Command "modify" from MartyBonacci/specswarm, covering user input, flag parsing, parse flags from arguments, mode routing and goal.
harness:audit
Cross-dimensional codebase audit orchestrator — classify repo shape, fan out parallel read-only audit agents, dedup and severity-rank findings against existing issues, publish grouped tracking issues.
deep-audit.skeleton
Aciklama: Bu bolum Bootstrap tarafindan manifest verileriyle doldurulur. Gerekli manifest alanlari: project.description, stack.primary, project.structure, project.subprojects, stack.orm, stack.authmethod Ornek cikti.
autofix-pr
Automatically identify and fix CI failures or review feedback on the current PR, then push the fixes.