creative

A command for making and recording technical design decisions before implementation. It uses the project's planning files and writes an architecture decision record, a document explaining an important choice and its trade-offs.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for backend or frontend design work after a task has been planned and the project's current context files are up to date.
Why use it?
It helps turn a broad development task into a reviewed design and leaves a record of why the chosen approach was taken.

Command for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/zenobia000/cursor-agentic-coding-template/creative
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zenobia000/cursor-agentic-coding-template

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,194 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00022 $0.01194
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00597
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00239
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00119

Measured 2d ago against content hash 6b3307e00e4a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

creative scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

  • creative — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
.cursor/commands/creative.md · 66 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

🎨 CREATIVE MODE (v3)

做出明智的設計決策,為專案奠定堅實的架構基礎,確保每一次的創造都有跡可循。

1. PLAN 🎯 (規劃)

Objective

針對一個具體的、已規劃好的任務,進行深入的技術設計和架構規劃,並將所有決策、理由和權衡,以「架構決策記錄 (ADR)」的形式,寫入一份新的 memory-bank/current/creative-[topic].md 文件中。

Guiding Rules

在執行此指令時,AI Agent 必須遵循以下規則:

  • 主要規則: .cursor/rules/principles/global.mdc
  • 架構原則: .cursor/rules/backend/overview.mdc.cursor/rules/frontend/overview.mdc
  • 設計模式: .cursor/rules/patterns/
  • 核心隔離: .cursor/rules/isolation_rules/main.mdc

Prerequisites Check

在開始設計之前,請確保:

  • 任務已規劃: memory-bank/current/tasks.md 中存在一個清晰、待設計的任務。
  • 上下文已同步: memory-bank/current/activeContext.md 反映了當前的工作焦點。
  • Failure Action: 如果沒有已規劃的任務,AI 必須建議用戶先執行 /plan/task-next

2. DO 実行 (執行)

Core Process

遵循一個包含批判性思維的結構化決策流程:

Step 0: 健康檢查 (Health Check)

  • 檢查任務清晰度:memory-bank/current/tasks.md 讀取當前任務。驗證其描述和驗收條件是否足夠清晰以進行設計。
  • 批判性思考: 如果任務描述過於寬泛 (e.g., "建立後端"),AI 必須拒絕設計,並建議用戶先使用 /plan 將任務進一步細化。

Step 1: 記憶體互動 - 讀取 (Memory Interaction - Read)

  • 讀取任務:memory-bank/current/tasks.md 中讀取當前要設計的任務的詳細資訊。
  • 讀取全局上下文: 讀取 memory-bank/current/projectbrief.md 以確保設計與專案總體目標一致。

Step 2: 設計與決策 (Design & Decision Making)

  • 分析選項: 針對任務需求,考慮 2-3 個可行的技術方案。
  • 評估權衡: 分析每個方案的優點 (Pros)、缺點 (Cons) 和風險 (Risks)。
  • 做出選擇: 選擇最適合當前專案約束和目標的方案,並清晰地闡明選擇的理由

Step 3: 記憶體互動 - 寫入 (Memory Interaction - Write)

  • 創建 ADR 文件: 將上述的設計過程和最終決策,寫入到一個新的 memory-bank/current/creative-[topic].md 文件中。
  • 更新任務列表: 更新 memory-bank/current/tasks.md 文件,在對應的任務下,添加一個指向剛剛創建的設計文檔的連結。

3. CHECK ✓ (檢查)

Verification Checklist

  • 決策已記錄: memory-bank/current/creative-[topic].md 是否已成功創建?
  • 任務已連結: memory-bank/current/tasks.md 中對應的任務是否已更新,並包含了指向新設計文檔的連結?

4. ACT 改善 (行動)

Finalization

  • 向用戶確認: 在完成寫入操作後,向用戶報告。例如:「我已為任務『XXX』完成了技術設計,並將決策記錄在 memory-bank/current/creative-auth-flow.md 中。tasks.md 也已同步更新。」

Next Steps

設計完成後,下一步就是將藍圖變為現實。

  • 👉 Primary Next Step: 執行 /implement 指令,AI 將會讀取 tasks.md 和新創建的 creative-*.md 文件,開始進行編碼。
  • 💡 Alternative: 如果設計方案存在較大不確定性,可以先執行 /implement 創建一個快速的「原型 (Prototype)」來驗證其可行性。

Read the full file on GitHub · 66 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 66 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 6b3307e00e4a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

creative is a command published in the GitHub repository Zenobia000/cursor-agentic-coding-template (30 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,194 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.