Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhyx12/projtoolWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zhyx12/projtool/report-new)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zhyx12/projtool/report-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zhyx12/projtool/report-new/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zhyx12/projtool/report-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zhyx12/projtool/report-new.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00989 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00396 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
report-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are running the user's /report-new command.
Steps
-
Ask the user which run(s) the report covers. Accept either explicit
run_ids or "the last run", "all of exp-X", "compare runs A and B".- For implicit selectors, call
mcp__projtool__list_runswith the appropriate filters and confirm with the user before continuing. - If a run is
is_dirty=true, mention it — the report frontmatter will get aprovenance_warningsfield.
- For implicit selectors, call
-
Decide the report type and scope:
- type:
single,comparison,ablation,seed_sweep,milestone. If unsure, ask. Default for one run issingle; for >1 run on the same branch, ask whether it's an ablation or comparison; for runs spanning multiple branches, the report is a cross-branch summary. - scope:
branch(default — report belongs to one code-repo branch, filed under that branch's directory in the docs repo) orsummary(cross-branch — filed undersummary/).
- type:
-
Call
mcp__projtool__start_reportwithexperiment_id,run_ids,report_type, andscope. The tool:- Loads each run's manifest (via
load_manifest). - Generates a report frontmatter prefilled with
referencesandmetrics_inlinedskeletons, plus the cross-repo fieldsgit.branch,git.commit,git.code_repo_url,git.commit_url. - Writes the file to the docs repo (NOT to the code repo!). The path is
either
<docs_repo>/<branch_full>/<date>-<topic_slug>.md(scope=branch) or<docs_repo>/summary/<date>-<topic_slug>.md(scope=summary), where<docs_repo>=<container_root>/docs/(the independent docs git repo at the container root, alongsidecode/andoutput/). The slug is initially "TBD"; pass a real slug tocommit_reportlater.
- Loads each run's manifest (via
-
Show the user the path to the new file. Open it (with
view) so they can see the frontmatter and start drafting the body. -
Reference handling:
- When the body cites a number, also fill the corresponding field in
metrics_inlined. If a number is in the body but missing from frontmatter, that's a violation — call it out. - If the run group is >8 runs, the tool will have generated a
data/<sweep-name>.csv(alongside the report, in the same docs-repo subdirectory) instead of inlining the list; tell the user.
- When the body cites a number, also fill the corresponding field in
-
Do not commit yet. The report is a draft. Tell the user to use
/report-commit(ormcp__projtool__commit_report) once they're done.commit_reportwill:- Validate that all cited code commits are pushed to the code repo's origin.
If not, it errors with a clear instruction to
git pushfirst (cross-repo invariant). git addthe specific.mdand (if externalized) CSV files, then commits and pushes to the docs repo's current branch (resolved viagit symbolic-ref --short HEAD, never hardcoded asmain) in the docs repo (NOT the code repo).
- Validate that all cited code commits are pushed to the code repo's origin.
If not, it errors with a clear instruction to
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A fbde99067a81
report-new is a command published in the GitHub repository zhyx12/projtool (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 989 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
report-new compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| report-newzhyx12/projtool | Command | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |