Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhyx12/projtoolWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zhyx12/projtool/thread-new)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zhyx12/projtool/thread-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zhyx12/projtool/thread-new/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zhyx12/projtool/thread-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zhyx12/projtool/thread-new.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00596 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00238 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
thread-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 44 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/thread-new — open a research thread
A thread is a research line: a narrative unit that lives at
threads/<slug>/ in the docs repo and gathers the experiments that pursue one
idea. This command opens one and gets its idea.md / plan.md started.
Steps
-
Pick the slug. Derive a short slug from the user's phrase and confirm it. The slug must match
^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*$(lowercase, digits, hyphens; no leading hyphen) and be unique. Callmcp__projtool__thread_treefirst and scan the existing threads — if a similar or near-duplicate line already exists, surface it and ask whether to reuse it instead of opening a second one. Note an optional human-readabletitle. -
Create the thread.
mcp__projtool__thread_new(slug, title)mints thethr_<ULID>record (statusactive) and writesthreads/<slug>/idea.mdandplan.mdskeletons in one docs commit. This works on an un-migrated project too: it bootstrapsdocs/registry/and does not touch the oldplans/layout. A duplicate slug is refused — pick another. -
Fill the narrative. Interview the user briefly, then edit:
threads/<slug>/idea.md— motivation and hypothesis (what we believe, why it's worth a GPU-day).threads/<slug>/plan.md— decision criteria (the metric + threshold that settles it) and the first experiment(s) you intend to run. Commit narrowly in the docs repo —git addonly those two files, nevergit add -A.
-
Point forward. When the code for the first experiment is committed,
mcp__projtool__register_experiment(slug=..., code_sha=<commit>, thread=<slug>)freezes the plan (dirty plan auto-committed, plan blob + snapshot anchored,code_sha= the exact commit you intend to run) and creates theexp/<slug>node. From there the normal run flow (instance_up/start_training/ finalize) applies unchanged.
Keep it light: a thread is a working narrative, not a proposal. One screen of
idea.md + plan.md is plenty to start.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 191d42b77cab
thread-new is a command published in the GitHub repository zhyx12/projtool (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 596 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
thread-new compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| thread-newzhyx12/projtool | Command | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |