Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zircote-plugins/rlm-rs-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zircote-plugins/rlm-rs-plugin/rlm-query)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zircote-plugins/rlm-rs-plugin/rlm-query"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zircote-plugins/rlm-rs-plugin/rlm-query/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zircote-plugins/rlm-rs-plugin/rlm-query"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zircote-plugins/rlm-rs-plugin/rlm-query.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00505 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00202 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
rlm-query scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 55 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 1905e7a4f5fa
rlm-query is a command published in the GitHub repository zircote-plugins/rlm-rs-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 5d ago), with no licence file. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 505 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
differential-audit
Audit EARS↔code coherence via a bidirectional differential. With no arguments, opens a scoping conversation that interprets what the user wants audited, maps it to arrows, and captures an explicit EARS selection. With one or more EARS IDs, audits those specs directly using configured defaults. Requires docs/arrows/…
arrow-maintenance
Run an audit-and-update pass on the docs/arrows/ overlay. Dispatches on project state — audits an existing overlay, bootstraps the overlay from existing LID docs, or redirects to /map-codebase or /linked-intent-dev for projects without LID.
verify
A command that independently checks the factual claims and file-and-line references in an agent’s most recent response. It reports whether each claim is confirmed, outdated, missing, or unsupported.
pm-agent-retire
Mark a great-pm agent as deprecated. Adds a deprecation banner to the agent file, files a Beads issue to remove dependent commands/workflows, and logs the rationale. NEVER deletes the file (history preserved).
pm-promote
Promote a draft artefact (strategy / spec / launch plan / etc.) to a gate-ready Beads issue. Runs mandatory pm-reviewer pass first; PASS verdict is required to promote.
pm-competitive
Competitive teardown — for a given competitor or for the whole landscape around a JTBD. Spawns market-analyst. Outputs structured brief with positioning gaps.