Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/znlnzi/claude-config-studio/code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/znlnzi/claude-config-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/znlnzi/claude-config-studio/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/znlnzi/claude-config-studio/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/znlnzi/claude-config-studio/code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00315 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/code-review - 代码审查
扫描未提交的更改，执行全面代码审查。
审查流程
1. 变更扫描
- 获取所有未提交的更改
- 按文件类型分组
- 评估变更范围
2. 安全检查 (关键优先级)
- 无硬编码凭证
- 无 SQL 注入风险
- 无 XSS 漏洞
- 所有输入已验证
- 认证/授权正确
3. 代码质量 (高优先级)
- 函数长度 < 50 行
- 文件长度 < 800 行
- 嵌套层级 < 4 层
- 错误处理完善
- 命名清晰一致
4. 最佳实践 (中优先级)
- 不可变数据模式
- 充分的测试覆盖
- 无冗余代码
- 无调试语句 (console.log)
输出格式
对每个发现的问题：
- [关键/警告/建议] file:line - 问题描述
- 修复建议
关键规则
包含关键或高优先级问题的提交将被阻止。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 45 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 480077e130fc
code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository znlnzi/claude-config-studio (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 315 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
statusbar-style
Switch the status-bar style (classic / capsule / hairline).
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
superpowers-execute
Execute the current GSD phase plan with Superpowers instead of gsd-execute-phase.
config
Command "config" from sdebruyn/fabric-dw-mcp-cli, covering configuration & defaults, http retry budget, sql retry budget, mcp workspace allowlist {#mcp-workspace-allowlist} and mcp server log level.
deps-age
Analyze dependency freshness and maintenance activity.
session-active
Set the persistent, per-session credo mode to active.