refactor-check

refactor-check is a command for Claude Code from Zouhair-Boulahlib/Claude-Code-Etymologiae. It costs 9 tokens per session (153 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only code review command that looks for common opportunities to simplify a file or directory.

In plain words
What is it for?
It reports each finding, explains why it matters, assigns a priority, and suggests a specific refactoring such as extracting a function or splitting a module.
Why use it?
It helps find repeated code, oversized functions, deeply nested logic, unused code, and classes that handle too many responsibilities without changing anything.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code command (commands/*.md).

Good fit It reports each finding, explains why it matters, assigns a priority, and suggests a specific refactoring such as extracting a function or splitting a module.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/zouhair-boulahlib/claude-code-etymologiae/refactor-check
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zouhair-Boulahlib/Claude-Code-Etymologiae

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for refactor-check

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zouhair-boulahlib/claude-code-etymologiae/refactor-check/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zouhair-boulahlib/claude-code-etymologiae/refactor-check)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zouhair-boulahlib/claude-code-etymologiae/refactor-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zouhair-boulahlib/claude-code-etymologiae/refactor-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for refactor-check

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zouhair-boulahlib/claude-code-etymologiae/refactor-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zouhair-boulahlib/claude-code-etymologiae/refactor-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 9 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 153 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00009 $0.00153
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00077
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00031
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00015

Measured 12d ago against content hash b05ab5d74ea8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

refactor-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

starter-kit/commands/refactor-check.md · 19 lines

What it actually says

Analyze the specified file or directory for refactoring opportunities:

  1. Duplication — Code repeated in multiple places that could be extracted
  2. Long functions — Functions over 40 lines that should be split
  3. Deep nesting — More than 3 levels of if/else or loops
  4. God objects — Classes/modules doing too many things
  5. Dead code — Unused functions, variables, imports

For each finding:

  • Explain what to improve and why
  • Rate priority: high / medium / low
  • Suggest the specific refactoring (extract function, split module, etc.)

Do NOT make changes — just report findings.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 19 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A b05ab5d74ea8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

refactor-check is a command published in the GitHub repository Zouhair-Boulahlib/Claude-Code-Etymologiae (10 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 153 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.