Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zulelee/test-files-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zulelee/test-files-mcp/generate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zulelee/test-files-mcp/generate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zulelee/test-files-mcp/generate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zulelee/test-files-mcp/generate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zulelee/test-files-mcp/generate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00235 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00094 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
generate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Generate Test File
Create a test fixture using the test-files MCP server based on: $ARGUMENTS
Steps
- Parse the user's request from
$ARGUMENTS(file type, size, count, corruption, etc.). - Select the appropriate MCP tool:
- Size-only file →
create_dummy_file_tool - Image →
create_image_tool - PDF →
create_pdf_tool - CSV →
create_csv_tool - JSON →
create_json_tool - ZIP →
create_archive_tool - WAV →
create_audio_tool - Corrupted →
create_corrupted_file_tool - Weird filename →
create_edge_case_filename_tool
- Size-only file →
- Call the tool and confirm the file exists at the returned absolute path.
- Summarize: path, size, and key metadata.
If the request is ambiguous, ask one clarifying question before generating.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 0fb9df8a1cb3
generate is a command published in the GitHub repository Zulelee/test-files-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 235 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
constraints
A command for defining a project's quality standards through a short interview and a written CONSTRAINTS.md file. It records checks, thresholds, exceptions, and commands for enforcing them.
modernize-transform
Transform one legacy module to the target stack — idiomatic rewrite with behavior-equivalence tests.
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.