Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/aixolotl/microsoft-planner-mcp/testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aixolotl/microsoft-planner-mcpWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00960 | $0.00960 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00480 | $0.00480 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00192 | $0.00192 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00096 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
microsoft-planner-mcp testing.instructions.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Conventions
Commenting Convention
Apply the same three-part comment pattern as the source code:
- Why — the reason the test or setup exists
- What breaks without it — what would go undetected
- Docs link — where to read more
Apply this to:
- The
MODULEconstant (why it must be the import/usage site, not the definition site) - Non-obvious mock shapes (e.g. why
result.value = NoneANDresult = Noneare both tested) - Fixture choice explanations (
graph_ctxvstoken_capturing_ctx) - Parametrize IDs that are not self-explanatory
# Patch at the usage module, not the definition module. Python resolves the
# imported reference when the tool module is first loaded; patching the
# definition site after that has no effect on the already-bound name.
MODULE = "src.tools.tasks"
Framework
- pytest with pytest-asyncio in
automode — async tests are detected automatically, no@pytest.mark.asyncioneeded - Run tests:
uv run pytest -v
Parameterized Tests
Always use @pytest.mark.parametrize with the ids keyword for readable test output. Place the decorator directly above the test function (after @pytest.mark.asyncio if async).
@pytest.mark.parametrize("status", [412, 409], ids=["conflict-412", "conflict-409"])
async def test_retries_on_conflict(status):
...
@pytest.mark.parametrize("input_val,expected", [
("a,b,c", ["a", "b", "c"]),
("x", ["x"]),
], ids=["multi-csv", "single-value"])
def test_parse_csv(input_val, expected):
...
Rules:
- Always provide
ids=with short, descriptive kebab-case labels - One test ID per parameter tuple — count of IDs must match count of parameter tuples
- Group related scenarios under a single parameterized test when they share identical assertion logic
- Use separate test functions when scenarios need different setup or assertions
Test File Structure
- Module docstring — one-line summary of what is tested
- Imports — standard lib, third-party, then project (
from src.…) - Helpers section — factory functions prefixed
make_(e.g.make_task(),make_graph_client()) - Test sections — grouped by concern with comment separators:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 109 lines · 960 tokens per session scan A 637abe7d9136
microsoft-planner-mcp testing.instructions.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository aixolotl/microsoft-planner-mcp (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 960 tokens to every session, about $0.0048 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other instructions, from other repositories
swag-mcp CLAUDE.md
Instructions for jmagar/swag-mcp, covering swag mcp - claude memory reference, project overview, core architecture, key components and common development commands.
sbb-opendata-mcp CLAUDE.md
Instructions for malkreide/sbb-opendata-mcp, covering claude.md, teil 1 — konventionen (portfolio-weit), vor der arbeit, tests and wenn etwas rot ist.
whatsapp-mcp-server CLAUDE.md
Instructions for HalemoGPA/whatsapp-mcp-server, covering working on this repo, the one idea, rules that follow from it, the box has a hard resource budget - stay inside it and repo-specific traps.
groupme-mcp-server AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for oddrationale/groupme-mcp-server, covering agents.md, what this is, toolchain — use these, not the alternatives, before you claim you are done and integration tests.
todoist-mcp-server CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for stevesimpson418/todoist-mcp-server, covering claude.md — project intelligence, project overview, tech stack, project structure and key commands.
gmail-mcp-server CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for stevesimpson418/gmail-mcp-server, covering claude.md — project intelligence, project overview, tech stack, project structure and key commands.