Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/anthony-chaudhary/dos-kernel/gemini-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anthony-chaudhary/dos-kernelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/anthony-chaudhary/dos-kernel/gemini-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/anthony-chaudhary/dos-kernel/gemini-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/anthony-chaudhary/dos-kernel/gemini-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00606 | $0.00606 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00303 | $0.00303 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00121 | $0.00121 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00061 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
dos-kernel GEMINI.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DOS — the part that doesn't believe the agents
This extension gives you the DOS trust syscalls as tools. DOS exists because an agent's word about its own work is the weakest signal in the loop. A worker can say it shipped a fix, say the tests pass, say it booked the reservation — and be wrong, or lying, with full confidence. DOS answers those questions from ground truth instead: git history, the file tree, a clock. Never from what the agent said it did.
Use these tools before you trust a claim, not after.
The rule
When you — or another agent, or the user — claim that a piece of work is done, do not trust the claim. Check it. The tools below check it for you.
- Before you report a task, phase, or feature as finished, call
dos_verify(did this plan/phase actually ship?) ordos_commit_audit(does this commit's message match what its diff actually did?). If the witness does not confirm the claim, say so plainly — do not report done. - Before two agents edit the same area at once, call
dos_arbitrateto find out whether their file trees collide. Disjoint trees may run together; an overlap is a refuse, and the tool names a free lane instead. - When you must decline or report blocked, use
dos_refuse_reasons/dos_check_reasonto pick a structured reason from the closed set, instead of free-text prose a system can't verify. - Before you rely on a cited legal case, call
dos_citation_resolveto confirm it exists in a real reporter — the antidote to a fabricated citation.
Why this matters
The failure DOS catches is the confident phantom: a write the agent authored
and believes, contradicted by a witness the agent wrote zero bytes of. A booking
"confirmed" that is not in the database. A fix: commit that only touched a
README. A --allow-empty "implemented the cache" that changed nothing. Each one
looks done. Each one is caught by reading the evidence, not the narration.
So: read the evidence. The tools are how.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 57 lines · 606 tokens per session scan A 944f9f207014
dos-kernel GEMINI.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository anthony-chaudhary/dos-kernel (19 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 606 tokens to every session, about $0.0030 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other instructions, from other repositories
takt AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for nrslib/takt, covering repository guidelines, project structure & module organization, build, test, and development commands, coding style & naming conventions and testing guidelines.
PuPu CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for haoxiang-xu/PuPu, covering gitnexus — code intelligence, always do, never do, resources and cli.
rondoflow CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for rondoflow/rondoflow, covering rondoflow, project overview, tech stack, development and setup.
claude-org-ja CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for suisya-systems/claude-org-ja, covering secretary, 事実は出典付きで書く(citation-or-abstain), 起動時, コミュニケーション and 輸送層(transport)両系 — 既定 renga / opt-in broker.
teamctl CLAUDE.md
Instructions for Alireza29675/teamctl, covering claude.md, what this repo is, stack and entry points, cross-cutting rules and how agents behave in this repo.
Polaris AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for sponge-b0b/Polaris, covering agents.md, purpose and authority, domain vocabulary, coding conduct and secrets.