Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ArieGoldkin/claude-forge. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ArieGoldkin/claude-forge/main/CLAUDE.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ArieGoldkin/claude-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/claude-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/claude-md/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/ariegoldkin/claude-forge/claude-md.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.13964 | $0.13964 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.05586 | $0.05586 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.02793 | $0.02793 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.01396 | $0.01396 |
Grade A, and why
claude-forge CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 605 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Claude Forge
Maintainer: Arie Goldkin Plugins: ctk (formerly continuity-toolkit), dtk (formerly devops-toolkit), atk (formerly ai-toolkit), ftk (formerly frontend-toolkit), etk (formerly engineering-toolkit) Versioning: Independent per plugin CC Alignment: v2.1.221 (triaged 2026-08-04) —
docs/reviews/2026-08-04_cc-v2.1.221-alignment-audit.md. That pass closed the 28-version gap by triage, not by behavioural probing: it measured what this repo ships and declares against the v2.1.194→221 CHANGELOG, and fixed the two claims found stale — the subagent nesting depth (5 → 3, having passed through 1) andcontext: forkskills now running in the background by default. ⚠ Its Tier-2/3 items are explicitly labelled hypotheses, not findings, because the previous audit's false floor note came from treating a CHANGELOG line as a conclusion. The auto-mode settings-path question (v2.1.207) is the one most likely to bite and is deliberately left unresolved pending a probe. Prior: v2.1.193 (audited 2026-06-26); the v2.1.174→193 gap analysis (model-governance enforcement viaenforceAvailableModels, the hookif-condition file-path fix, auto-mode native git-blocking +classifyAllShell, nested-subagent 5-deep (superseded — the live default is 3, see the Subagent section),/pluginSkills tab) is indocs/reviews/2026-06-26_cc-v2.1.193-alignment-gaps.md. Floor note — RETRACTED 2026-08-01, it was wrong (issue #98). It previously read that ctk'shooks.jsonfile-pathifconditions depend on the v2.1.176 fix "to gate correctly," making that the effective minimum CC version for our security/permission hooks. Measured on v2.1.220: 4 of the 6 conditions were probed directly and none gated — neither the Bash ones nor the file-path ones (the other 2 are inferred, not measured — see the write-up). All 6 were removed from ctk'shooks.json; each hook's own internal guard is and always was the real filter. Cause (best-supported explanation, from the official hooks docs plus measurement): they were wrong twice over —ifis a hook-handler field (sibling oftype/command), not a matcher-group field, so at group level the key was never read; andif"holds exactly one permission rule — there is no&&,||, or list syntax," while every value we shipped was a||-joined list. ⚠ The correct-looking fix is the dangerous one — do NOT "fix the nesting." Movingifinto the handlers and splitting the lists is exactly what the CC docs prescribe in general, and onPreToolUse[0]it would confinesecurity-blockerto 20 destructive-verb globs, letting every secret-file read through (cat <envfile>,curl -d @<envfile>,cat ~/.ssh/id_rsamatch none of them).PreToolUse[2]is the same trap for the write path. CC's own docs agree on the principle: "theiffilter is best-effort, use the permission system rather than a hook to enforce a hard allow or deny." Pinned byplugins/continuity-toolkit/hooks/tests/hooks-manifest.test.ts. The false claim originated in a CHANGELOG gap-analysis that verified the conditions were present and never that they gate. Full measurements, the six-key landmine table, and what remains NOT ESTABLISHED (what CC does with a malformedifat the correct nesting level — undocumented; and the "never read at group level" step is an inference from measurement, not a documented fact):docs/reviews/2026-08-01_98-hook-if-condition-cause.md. Per-version "considered but not adopted" notes are not tracked here — seegit log -p CLAUDE.mdor the CC CHANGELOG for prior reasoning. ⚠ Two earlier reviews are cited by this header but have no write-up in the repo: the v2.1.159→173 and v2.1.153→158 passes nameddocs/reviews/2026-06-11_cc-v2.1.173-alignment-audit.mdanddocs/reviews/2026-05-31_cc-v2.1.158-plugin-system-alignment-audit.md. Measured 2026-08-04: neither file has ever been committed on any branch (git log --all --diff-filter=Areturns 0 for both), so those citations have always been dangling. Their findings survive only in this header and ingit log -p CLAUDE.md. Do not go looking for the files.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 605 lines · 13,964 tokens per session scan F 0f1982f391fc
claude-forge CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository ArieGoldkin/claude-forge (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13,964 tokens to every session, about $0.0559 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other instructions, from other repositories
vscode buildNext.instructions.md
Working notes and architecture documentation for the new esbuild-based build system in build/next. Use when making changes to the new build pipeline (transpile/bundle commands, NLS plugin, source-map handling, resource copying, or self-hosting watch tasks).
next.js AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for vercel/next.js, covering next.js development guide, codebase structure, monorepo overview, core package: packages/next and other important packages.
vscode oss-third-party-notices.instructions.md
Instructions for microsoft/vscode, covering vs code oss third-party-notices pipeline, architecture, pipeline flow in ci, cache eligibility and rollout and applying the notice (cutover).
langchain AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for langchain-ai/langchain, covering global development guidelines for the langchain monorepo, corridor security analysis, project architecture and context, monorepo structure and development tools & commands.
vscode copilot-instructions.md
Copilot instructions for microsoft/vscode, covering vs code copilot instructions, project overview, root folders, core architecture (src/ folder) and built-in extensions (extensions/ folder).
deno copilot-instructions.md
Copilot instructions for denoland/deno, covering deno development guide for github copilot, network access, high level overview, key directories and key files to understand first.