smartmemo AGENTS.md

Repository instructions for SmartMemo, a layer that remembers earlier requests to language models and reuses their answers when a new request means the same thing.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when building or maintaining cached language-model calls for AI agents, including the matching model and its training on agent records.
Why use it?
It can avoid sending equivalent requests to the model again, while using a trained classifier instead of a simple similarity cutoff to decide whether two requests match.

Instructions file for CodexOpenCode

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/awesome-pro/smartmemo/agents-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/awesome-pro/smartmemo

Made for: Codex, OpenCode.

Per session 7,874 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 7,874 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.07874 $0.07874
Opus 5 $0.03937 $0.03937
Sonnet 5 $0.01575 $0.01575
Haiku 4.5 $0.00787 $0.00787

Measured 2d ago against content hash b46540723223, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

smartmemo AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

AGENTS.md · 696 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 696 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

AGENTS.md — SmartMemo Project Guide

This document is the single source of truth for the SmartMemo project. Read this fully before writing any code. Every architectural and ML decision is explained here.


What is SmartMemo?

SmartMemo is a semantic caching layer for LLM agent calls that uses a learned equivalence classifier instead of a fixed cosine-similarity threshold.

It sits between an agent and its LLM provider. When the agent makes an LLM call, SmartMemo checks if a "semantically equivalent" call has been made before. If yes, it returns the cached response and saves the cost of an actual LLM call. If no, it lets the call through and stores the result for next time.

The crucial difference from existing semantic caches (GPTCache, etc.): SmartMemo does not trust cosine similarity to decide equivalence. It uses a small ML classifier — finetuned on real agent traces from the specific domain — to make that decision. This eliminates the false-positive failures that have kept production teams from adopting semantic caching.

One-line pitch:

"Semantic caching for LLM agents that actually works in production — a learned equivalence classifier replaces the naive cosine threshold that causes false-positive failures in GPTCache and similar tools."


The Foundational Truth

Before any code, internalize this:

Cosine similarity is not equivalence.

Two prompts can be 97% similar in embedding space and ask for opposite things. "Should I accept this meeting?" and "Should I reject this meeting?" have near-identical embeddings but require opposite responses. Naive semantic caching cannot tell them apart.

This is not a tunable-threshold problem. There is no threshold that works across domains, tasks, or prompt styles. Whatever threshold you pick, in some domain the false positive rate is unacceptable, and in another the cache hit rate is too low to matter.

The solution is not a better threshold. The solution is learning what equivalence means, per domain, from data.

Read the full file on GitHub · 696 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 696 lines · 7,874 tokens per session scan A b46540723223

Subscribe to this mod's changes

smartmemo AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository awesome-pro/smartmemo (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7,874 tokens to every session, about $0.0394 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.