vite-ts-react-template workflow.instructions.md

A set of instructions for making changes in a Vite and React code repository, including how to inspect files and verify the result.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when implementing repository changes that require scanning relevant files, checking AIDEV notes, adding or updating anchors, running the linter, and verifying the completed task.
Why use it?
It helps keep code changes focused, preserve useful developer notes, run the required checks, and confirm that the work functions afterward.

Instructions file for GitHub Copilot

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/bartstc/vite-ts-react-template/workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bartstc/vite-ts-react-template

Made for: GitHub Copilot.

Per session 194 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 194 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00194 $0.00194
Opus 5 $0.00097 $0.00097
Sonnet 5 $0.00039 $0.00039
Haiku 4.5 $0.00019 $0.00019

Measured 2d ago against content hash 851175f64a78, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

vite-ts-react-template workflow.instructions.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/instructions/workflow.instructions.md · 26 lines

What it actually says

Workflow

Scanning Repository

  • Analyze using only files mentioned in the prompt or directly relevant to the task
  • Check for AIDEV-* anchors in relevant subdirectories before scanning broadly

Anchor Comments

Use AIDEV-NOTE:, AIDEV-TODO:, or AIDEV-QUESTION: for inline knowledge (≤ 120 chars, greppable).

  • Grep for existing anchors before scanning files
  • Update anchors when modifying associated code
  • When an anchor is stale, update it instead of removing it; flag if unsure
  • Add anchors when code is complex, critical, confusing, or potentially buggy

Implementation

  • Run pnpm lint --fix after making changes
  • Stay within current task context — inform dev if a fresh start is needed
  • When a task is done, verify it works before reporting completion
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 26 lines · 194 tokens per session scan A 851175f64a78

Subscribe to this mod's changes

vite-ts-react-template workflow.instructions.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository bartstc/vite-ts-react-template (121 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 194 tokens to every session, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.