Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to breezewish/CodexPotter. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/breezewish/CodexPotter/v2/AGENTS.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/breezewish/CodexPotterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/breezewish/codexpotter/agents-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/breezewish/codexpotter/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/breezewish/codexpotter/agents-md/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/breezewish/codexpotter/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/breezewish/codexpotter/agents-md.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00306 | $0.00306 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00122 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00061 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
CodexPotter AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Repository Guidelines
Workflow Principles
- NEVER use git to discard or revert any changes not made by you - they are proposely changed by user and you should live with that.
Engineering Rules
This project requires extremely high code quality and maintainability. Best engineering practices must be followed at all times.
The rules below are some typical principles. They are not exhaustive, and you must always use your best judgment to write the cleanest code possible. You must always clean up and refactor immediately when you see opportunities or any violations of these engineering rules.
Core Principles: Simplicity & Readability
- Boring Code - Obvious, self-explanatory > clever, minimize cognitive load
- Single Responsibility - One function, one job
- Explicit over Implicit - Clear is better than concise
- Meaningful Abstractions - Only when they reduce cognitive load
- Keep DRY - Only if it does not conflict with the above principles
Better Maintainability
- Keep the public API surface minimal; prefer reusing existing methods
- Don't treat "looks similar" as "equivalent"
- Abstractions must be meaningful
- Keep certainty, single source of truth - e.g. don't introduce "optional" unless absolutely necessary
- Always add clear, concise and explicit doc comments for public APIs, complex logic, and non-obvious code
Naming Symbols
- Choosing the name that needs the least explanation, consider: verb clarity, noun specificity, context
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 306 tokens per session scan A 24716380d908
CodexPotter AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository breezewish/CodexPotter (635 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 306 tokens to every session, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
CodexPotter AGENTS.md compared with instructions from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodexPotter AGENTS.mdbreezewish/CodexPotter | Instructions file | 635 | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 306 | Codex, OpenCode |
| vscode buildNext.instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscode | Instructions file | 195k | yesterday | MIT | A | 9,719 | GitHub Copilot |
| next.js AGENTS.mdvercel/next.js | Instructions file | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 7,461 | Codex, OpenCode |
| langchain AGENTS.mdlangchain-ai/langchain | Instructions file | 149k | yesterday | MIT | A | 4,680 | Codex, OpenCode |
| vscode oss-third-party-notices.instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscode | Instructions file | 195k | yesterday | MIT | A | 5,516 | GitHub Copilot |
| vscode copilot-instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscode | Instructions file | 195k | yesterday | MIT | A | 3,093 | GitHub Copilot |
| deepseek-harness AGENTS.mddeepseek-ai/deepseek-harness | Instructions file | 274k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 4,313 | Codex, OpenCode |