Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/bruhsb/paperclip-mcp/agents-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bruhsb/paperclip-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/bruhsb/paperclip-mcp/agents-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/bruhsb/paperclip-mcp/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/bruhsb/paperclip-mcp/agents-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.03944 | $0.03944 |
| Opus 5 | $0.01972 | $0.01972 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00789 | $0.00789 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00394 | $0.00394 |
Grade B, and why
paperclip-mcp AGENTS.md scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Sends data to an external URLmediumData exfiltration
A POST to an outside endpoint may be telemetry or may be exfiltration; either way the mod talks to somewhere, and you should know where.
| Create issue | `curl -s -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"title":"...","status":"todo","priority":"medium","projectId":"<YOUR_PROJECT_ID>","goalId":"<YOUR_GOAL_ID>","assigneeAgentId":"<YOUR_CTO_AGENT_ID Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
5. **If `paperclip_create_issue` itself is the failing tool** (or the create call fails after one retry), fall back to curl: How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AGENTS.md
This file documents the Paperclip-orchestrated agent protocol and BMAD integration. If you are a general contributor or an end-user of this MCP server, skip this file — see CONTRIBUTING.md for dev setup and docs/README.md for user docs. This file is for agents running inside a Paperclip control plane.
Paperclip Agent Workflow
This section is for Paperclip-orchestrated agents. Human developers can skip it.
Do not invoke any /bmad-* skills. These are for human operators only. Your workflow is below.
Orchestration Model
- Scrum Master is the SOLE agent with a scheduled heartbeat (every 5 min). All 7 other agents (CEO, CTO, PM, Engineer, QA, DevOps, TechWriter) have
heartbeat.enabled: falseand wake ONLY on @-mention. - Max 3 agents running at any time (Scrum Master + 2 IC agents).
- One issue per agent — finish it completely before picking up another.
- QA is the SOLE merge owner. IC agents push feature branches and set
in_review; QA's APPROVE decision performs the merge, worktree cleanup, anddonetransition. IC agents never callgit mergeorgit push origin main. - CEO is the SOLE agent hirer. All new specialist agents go through CEO using the
paperclip-hire-agentskill, subject to board approval. CTO, Scrum Master, PM, and everyone else must NOT invoke the skill or draft hire proposals unilaterally.
@-Mention Flow
Scrum Master (heartbeat) → picks backlog → assigns → @Engineer "PAP-XX ready"
Engineer → implements → commits → push branch → set in_review → @QA "ready for review" → EXIT
QA (sole reviewer + merger) → APPROVE (squash-merge to main + delete branch + done) / REQUEST_CHANGES (todo + @role) / ESCALATE (blocked + @CTO)
Scrum Master (next heartbeat) → catches orphaned in_review → @QA · clears stale locks · closes done epics · cleans board
Agent Protocol (IC agents: Engineer / DevOps / TechWriter)
paperclip_get_me— confirm identity.- Check
PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID/PAPERCLIP_WAKE_REASON— find why you woke. You were woken by an explicit @-mention (no heartbeat fires for you); identify the trigger. - Label Bootstrap. Call
paperclip_list_labelsonce and cache thename → uuidmap for the run. If any required taxonomy labels are missing (source:*,status:refined|unrefined,type:*,agent:*), callpaperclip_create_labelto seed them before proceeding. Full taxonomy and colors:docs/guides/issue-creation-standard.md. paperclip_get_inbox— find your assigned issue.paperclip_checkout_issue— claim it, passingexpectedStatusesfor your role so the server atomically validates the kanban column before flipping status. Engineer / DevOps / TechWriter pass["todo"]; QA passes["in_review"]for code review or["todo"]for test-writing tasks. Never retry a 409 and never retry a status-mismatch rejection. If the checkout fails for either reason, postWake mismatch: PAP-XX is in status <X>, expected [<expected>]. Not claiming. @Scrum Master — please verify assignment.on the issue, then exit cleanly. Do not mutate any other state.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 192 lines · 3,944 tokens per session scan B 1d7e54823f68
paperclip-mcp AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository bruhsb/paperclip-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3,944 tokens to every session, about $0.0197 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (sends data to an external url, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other instructions, from other repositories
vscode buildNext.instructions.md
Working notes and architecture documentation for the new esbuild-based build system in build/next. Use when making changes to the new build pipeline (transpile/bundle commands, NLS plugin, source-map handling, resource copying, or self-hosting watch tasks).
codex AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for openai/codex, covering rust/codex-rs, the codex-core crate, code review rules, crate api surface and model visible context.
vscode oss-third-party-notices.instructions.md
Instructions for microsoft/vscode, covering vs code oss third-party-notices pipeline, architecture, pipeline flow in ci, applying the notice (cutover) and fallback chain (never fail the build).
spec-kit AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for github/spec-kit, covering agents.md, about spec kit and specify, quickstart — add a new integration in 5 steps, integration architecture and integrationmanifest — file tracking.
next.js AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for vercel/next.js, covering next.js development guide, codebase structure, monorepo overview, core package: packages/next and other important packages.
langchain AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for langchain-ai/langchain, covering global development guidelines for the langchain monorepo, corridor security analysis, project architecture and context, monorepo structure and development tools & commands.