EvidenceForge AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md - EvidenceForge

This document provides AI coding agents with everything needed to write consistent, idiomatic code for the EvidenceForge project.

Project Overview

EvidenceForge generates realistic synthetic security logs for cybersecurity threat hunting training and research. The system uses a two-phase hybrid architecture:

Phase 1 - Scenario Creation (Skill-assisted): Claude Code Skills guide users through scenario creation via structured interviews. Skills research TTPs via MITRE ATT&CK, expand high-level descriptions into detailed execution plans, and output structured YAML scenario files with companion research markdown.

Phase 2 - Log Generation (Deterministic): Generation engine executes the detailed scenario plan WITHOUT any LLM calls, producing large-scale, temporally consistent datasets across multiple log formats (Windows Event Logs, Zeek, Syslog, Snort/Suricata, web logs) with coordinated cross-references (matching LogonIDs, PIDs, session data).

This architecture combines LLM flexibility/realism with deterministic speed, cost-efficiency, and reproducibility.

Key Principle: The eforge CLI is a deterministic tool. Creative/interactive work happens through Claude Code Skills, not built-in LLM calls. Phase 2 is a deterministic renderer that executes the plan. Never call LLMs during generation. LLM integration is not built-in; scenario creation uses Claude Code Skills.

Storyline Events (Phase 8.4): Storyline entries use typed events lists, not free-text keyword matching. Each event has a type field (process, logon, connection, ssh_session, etc.) with per-type validated fields. The activity field is documentation only (for GROUND_TRUTH.md). See docs/reference/scenario-reference.md for the full event type reference.

Baseline Realism: The baseline engine includes: Hawkes self-exciting temporal model for bursty user activity (parameters derived from persona risk_profile), periodic+jitter timing for system/service traffic, day-of-week variation (Monday login storms, weekend near-zero), 26 legitimate lateral movement patterns (backup, monitoring, AD replication, app→DB, etc.), process→network correlation (browsers→HTTPS, DB clients→SQL, etc.), enriched stale account noise (Kerberos failures, lingering tasks, service startup failures), network-level red herrings (suspicious DNS, unusual outbound, scan overlaps), Linux syslog depth (18 categories including SSH login/key exchange, apt/dnf, systemd timers, logrotate, journald), diversified command pools with per-user parameterization, and entity lifecycle validation (boot time tracking, PID existence checks). Lateral movement patterns are conditional on environment topology — assign roles to systems to enable specific patterns.