super-fr AGENTS.md

super-fr AGENTS.md is an instructions file for Codex, OpenCode from derio-net/super-fr. It costs 3,231 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

Repository instructions for coding agents working on the super-fr project itself. They describe its folder layout, development commands, and rules for keeping source files and generated copies aligned.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them when maintaining super-fr, a Python workspace containing its command-line engine, planning system, journals, and isolation workflow.
Why use it?
They give agents the project context and working rules needed to change super-fr safely. This helps prevent edits in the wrong place or changes that leave generated instructions out of sync.

Instructions file for CodexOpenCode

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/derio-net/super-fr/agents-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/derio-net/super-fr

Made for: Codex, OpenCode.

Per session 3,231 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 3,231 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.03231 $0.03231
Opus 5 $0.01615 $0.01615
Sonnet 5 $0.00646 $0.00646
Haiku 4.5 $0.00323 $0.00323

Measured 3d ago against content hash b8fb5674ed61, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

super-fr AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

AGENTS.md · 221 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agent instructions — super-fr

Internal working notes for agents maintaining this repo (super-fr itself, not a repo that merely installs it). User-facing rules the plugin ships to consumer repos live in plugins/super-fr/rules/; this file is for agents changing super-fr's own source. Claude Code reads this via CLAUDE.md's @AGENTS.md import; OpenCode reads it directly plus opencode.json's instructions array (.opencode/instructions/*.md — generated, see below).

Repo shape

uv workspace monorepo, version lockstepped across every manifest (see "Release / version bumping"). packages/:

  • fr — the CLI/engine: plan-as-folder model, GitHub tracking (render → observe → diff → apply, single mutation path in apply.py, dry-run by default), isolation lifecycle. Entrypoint fr = "fr.cli:app".
    • fr journal (fr/journal/, commands/journal_cmd.py) — scope-keyed (spec|plan|debug) durable run-state under docs/superpowers/journals/{specs,plans,debug}/ (one subdir per scope so the tree is glanceable; archived to implemented/journals/<scope>/). add (idempotent on --id) / render (raw, feeds PR bodies) / check (fail-closed on open findings). fr plan create seeds a plan journal; parsing never depends on one (back-compat). fr-goal & fr-debugging write it as they run.
    • fr models (fr/models.py, commands/models_cmd.py) — tier → model bindings (~/.config/fr/models.yaml, repo override > user) for fr-goal subagent dispatch; PhaseHeader.tier is the harness-neutral hint.
    • fr-goal subagent execution (2026-07-22 spec): fr-goal dispatches each phase to the plugins/super-fr/agents/fr-phase-executor agent (serial, shared workspace); scripts/ensure-phase-executor-allowlist.sh (called by install.sh) allowlists it in the org agent-worktree hook, else fr-goal falls back to inline.
  • fr-dispatch — runner-agnostic protocol/tick framework. Runners register via the fr.runners entry-point group, not by editing this package.
  • fr-vk, fr-cncd — runner adapters (vk, cncd) implementing that protocol. fr-cncd is real but predates its own README/CLAUDE mentions — don't assume tables in README.md are exhaustive; check packages/*/pyproject.toml and plugins/super-fr/skills/ against prose before trusting a list.
  • fr-opencode-pluginthe one non-Python package: TypeScript/Bun, ports the fr-isolation-required Claude Code hook to an OpenCode tool.execute.before plugin. Excluded from the uv workspace (pyproject.toml's [tool.uv.workspace].exclude); has its own package.json/version; not wired into CI — if you touch it, run bun test inside packages/fr-opencode-plugin/ yourself.

Read the full file on GitHub · 221 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 221 lines · 3,231 tokens per session scan A b8fb5674ed61

Subscribe to this mod's changes

super-fr AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository derio-net/super-fr (1 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3,231 tokens to every session, about $0.0162 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.