Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy/agents-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/detailobsessed/codereviewbuddyWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.01414 | $0.01414 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00707 | $0.00707 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00283 | $0.00283 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00141 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
codereviewbuddy AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to claude-code-trace AGENTS.md — 126 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitNexus — Code Intelligence
This project is indexed by GitNexus as codereviewbuddy (1034 symbols, 3078 relationships, 73 execution flows). Use the GitNexus MCP tools to understand code, assess impact, and navigate safely.
If any GitNexus tool warns the index is stale, run
npx gitnexus analyzein terminal first.
Always Do
- MUST run impact analysis before editing any symbol. Before modifying a function, class, or method, run
gitnexus_impact({target: "symbolName", direction: "upstream"})and report the blast radius (direct callers, affected processes, risk level) to the user. - MUST run
gitnexus_detect_changes()before committing to verify your changes only affect expected symbols and execution flows. - MUST warn the user if impact analysis returns HIGH or CRITICAL risk before proceeding with edits.
- When exploring unfamiliar code, use
gitnexus_query({query: "concept"})to find execution flows instead of grepping. It returns process-grouped results ranked by relevance. - When you need full context on a specific symbol — callers, callees, which execution flows it participates in — use
gitnexus_context({name: "symbolName"}).
When Debugging
gitnexus_query({query: "<error or symptom>"})— find execution flows related to the issuegitnexus_context({name: "<suspect function>"})— see all callers, callees, and process participationREAD gitnexus://repo/codereviewbuddy/process/{processName}— trace the full execution flow step by step- For regressions:
gitnexus_detect_changes({scope: "compare", base_ref: "main"})— see what your branch changed
When Refactoring
- Renaming: MUST use
gitnexus_rename({symbol_name: "old", new_name: "new", dry_run: true})first. Review the preview — graph edits are safe, text_search edits need manual review. Then run withdry_run: false. - Extracting/Splitting: MUST run
gitnexus_context({name: "target"})to see all incoming/outgoing refs, thengitnexus_impact({target: "target", direction: "upstream"})to find all external callers before moving code. - After any refactor: run
gitnexus_detect_changes({scope: "all"})to verify only expected files changed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 103 lines · 1,414 tokens per session scan A cec2d6612d13
codereviewbuddy AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed ISC. It adds 1,414 tokens to every session, about $0.0071 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to claude-code-trace AGENTS.md, differing in 126 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other instructions, from other repositories
RivalSearchMCP AGENTS.md
Instructions for damionrashford/RivalSearchMCP, covering agents.md, project overview, development commands, setup & running and install dependencies.
vscode-gitlens CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for gitkraken/vscode-gitlens, a project described as: Supercharge Git inside VS Code and unlock untapped knowledge within each repository — Visualize code authorship at a glance via Git blame annotations and CodeLens, seamlessly navigate and explore Git repositories, gain valuable insights via…
substack-gateway-oss CLAUDE.md
Instructions for jakub-k-slys/substack-gateway-oss, covering claude.md, commands, install dependencies (dev included, all workspace members), run the server (dev mode with reload) and lint.
blender-mcp AGENTS.md
Instructions for sandraschi/blender-mcp, covering blender-mcp agent context and quick ref.
sagemath-mcp CLAUDE.md
Instructions for XBP-Europe/sagemath-mcp, covering claude.md, project, commands, linting and testing.
nexus-mcp AGENTS.md
Instructions for j7an/nexus-mcp, covering agents.md - guidelines for ai coding agents, project overview, build, lint, test commands, setup (first time) and run all tests (unit + e2e, fast).