What the reviewer found
Same AGENTS.md template family (cross_agent_session_resumer project), with an added note warning that this project touches real session artifacts so destructive commands are extra high-risk. The comment marker, forbidden-commands list, and user-agent line are the same benign/defensive text as the other entries in this family.
What was read
The file as it ships in Dicklesworthstone/cross_agent_session_resumer:
AGENTS.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 3things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 3 as false.
P2Hidden instructions — false positiveRMRecursive force delete — false positiveNETMakes network calls — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.